Consciousness and the measurement problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between consciousness and the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, referencing the concept that consciousness may cause wave function collapse. Participants express skepticism about this idea, particularly questioning the credibility of the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR), which has since been defunct and not taken seriously in the scientific community. The measurement problem itself is highlighted as a significant issue within quantum mechanics, where the principles of measurement conflict with the dynamics of quantum theory. This conflict has been a longstanding topic of debate, notably illustrated by the Einstein-Bohr debates and concepts like Schrödinger's cat. Some astrophysicists propose that the act of observation affects the observer's wave function rather than that of the observed system, adding complexity to the discussion. Overall, the conversation reflects a blend of curiosity and skepticism regarding the intersection of consciousness and quantum mechanics.
Viva-Diva
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Consciousness and "the measurement problem"

Hello All,

Just a reminder that I am not a physicist...but for those who closed my thread on power of the mind :-(((( , pleae share your views on

this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_causes_collapse

and this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princeton_Engineering_Anomalies_Research_Lab

If there is a lab at Priceton University studing this, why do you all think it is bull? Bear with me, I am just trying to understand.

Thanks to all in advance!
Viva-Diva
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Viva-Diva said:
Hello All,

Just a reminder that I am not a physicist...but for those who closed my thread on power of the mind :-(((( , pleae share your views on

this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_causes_collapse

and this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princeton_Engineering_Anomalies_Research_Lab

If there is a lab at Priceton University studing this, why do you all think it is bull? Bear with me, I am just trying to understand.

Thanks to all in advance!
Viva-Diva

Unless you are able to measure consciousness by some instrument you can't prove any connection between consciousness and wave function collapse. Thus you will not find answers to your questions in the physics department.
 
maybe it should have been in the 'philosophy' or 'Scepticism and debunking' forum area?
 
PEAR is defunct, over, kaput. It was never taken seriously. The funding was mostly private, it was a bit of an embarrassment to Princeton.
 
Last edited:
Measurement in Quantum Theory
From the inception of Quantum Mechanics (QM) the concept of measurement has proved a source of difficulty. The Einstein-Bohr debates, out of which both the Einstein Podolski Rosen paradox and Schrödinger's cat paradox developed, centered upon this difficulty. The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics arises out of the fact that several principles of the theory appear to be in conflict. In particular, the dynamic principles of quantum mechanics seem to be in conflict with the postulate of collapse. David Albert puts the problem nicely when he says:

'The dynamics and the postulate of collapse are flatly in contradiction with one another ... the postulate of collapse seems to be right about what happens when we make measurements, and the dynamics seems to be bizarrely wrong about what happens when we make measurements, and yet the dynamics seems to be right about what happens whenever we aren't making measurements.' (Albert 1992, 79)

This has come to be known as "the measurement problem" and in what follows, we study the details and examine some of the implications of this problem. [continued]
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-measurement/

There is a view among some astophysicists [Quantum Cosmologists, I guess] that an observation of a QM system collapses the wavefunction of the observer, and not the function of that observed!
 
Last edited:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top