Conservation in Dynamite Explosion

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on conservation during a dynamite explosion, participants analyze which quantities are conserved. The consensus is that internal energy, total energy, mass, and electric charge are conserved, while potential energy itself is not a conserved quantity. The conversation highlights the distinction between potential energy as a concept and the laws of conservation that apply to energy, mass, and charge. There is a debate over the clarity of language used, particularly regarding the definition and implications of potential energy. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding conservation laws in physics.
stl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
6. Which of the following is NOT conserved when a stick of dynamite explodes?



a Internal (chemical potential energy)
b. Total energy
c. Mass
d. Electric charge
e. None of the above. They are all conserved.



My best guess is none of the above because chemical potential energy merely rearranges the position of atoms, energy can not be created nor destroyed, mass cannot be created or destroyed, and the total amount of positive charge minus the total amount of negative charge of an isolated system does not change.

Thank you for taking time out of your day to help me become a little better!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is potential energy ITSELF always conserved?

If I drop a ball from height h and it hits the ground, what's the potential energy before I drop it and after it hits the ground?
 
The last one "None of the above. They are all conserved" is self-contradictory so that can't be right!

Yes, there is a law of conservation of total energy, a law of conservation of mass, and a law of conservation of charge. There is no "law of conservation of potential energy".
 
... because chemical potential energy merely rearranges the position of atoms,

i think poor grammar has muddled your thinking .

that sentence doesn't parse.

Verb 'rearranges' implies action
where's the corresponding verb implying action in the phrase
chemical potential energy
? I see two adjectives and a noun.

Potential energy is the ability to do something, not the doing of something.
Where's the verb ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top