Conservation of Bayron number, Lepton number and strangeness

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation laws in particle physics, specifically baryon number, lepton number, and strangeness. These laws are considered fundamental properties of nature, which are intrinsic and lack deeper explanations. Baryons and leptons are classifications of fundamental particles, with baryon number being conserved during particle decay processes. An example is provided where neutron decay conserves baryon number, while certain combinations of particles do not, highlighting the importance of these conservation laws. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the underlying principles of particle interactions.
Yael
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

i'm stuck on my homework.. and this particle physics and cosmology chapter is killing me

a question asks me to discuss the following conservation laws: energy, linear momentum, angular momentum, electric charge (ok so far) AND bayron number, lepton number and strangeness.
are all of these laws based on fundamental properties of nature? Explain.

Now i do get the laws of conservation of bayron, lepton and strangeness...
but what do they mean exactly by fundamental properties?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamental properties of matter are those things that have no "why" beneath them. Mass is a property that matter has, so is charge. Turns out, as quantum was figured out, that there are more properties that just "are." "strangeness" is a property of matter. Its a strange property, hence its name. Don't worry about it now, it just "is."

Baryons and leptons are classifications for fundamental particles. There are many types of each, so "baryon-ness" is NOT a property. Energy and momentum are derived quantities.
 
Excuse me for responding so far, but I think this can be helpful for somebody who visit this page.I´m going to talk about the baryon number. For example, in a neutron decay we can get a proton+electron+antineutrino; this transformation doesn´t violate the energy and charge conservation laws, and so we can set a question, why can't we obtain from this decay the combination electron+positron+one or more neutrinos and antineutrinos if that laws aren´t also broken?
The answer to this question was answered by Ernest Stückelberg (or something like that) that introduced heavy charges (now known as the bayron quantum number) who said that that number must be conservated as well in all the possible combinations of a decay and not into the forbidden ones, so neutron and proton are assumed to have the value of 1 for this number, electron, positron and neutrino are related to the 0 and the antiparticles to the additive inverse of the particle number.
So we get:
electron (0) +proton (1) + antineutrino (0)= 1 (neutron's bayron number), so this result is allowed.
electron (0) + positron (0) + neutrinos or antineutrinos (0)= 0 (the baryon number isn´t conserved and the result is forbidden)
I hope you find it useful. (For more information I reccomend see the book: facts and mysteries in elementary particle physics, written by Martinus Veltman)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top