Conservation of Energy in Friedman Equation

paultsui
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The first law of thermodynamics states that dU = -PdV + dQ
We can apply this to the expansion of the universe by assuming the expansion of space is a adiabatic process, i.e. dQ = 0. Together with the FW metric, we end up with one of the Friedman Equations: \dot{\rho} = -\frac{3\dot{a}}{a}(p + P/c^{2})

Now let's focus on a cubic region of space. In the case P=0, this means that \dot{\rho} = -\frac{3\dot{a}}{a}(p). This makes sense because this accounts for the fact that when the universe expands, the energy density within get diluted. However, when P != 0, we also have the term -\frac{3\dot{a}}{a}(P/c^{2}). This terms correspond to the -pdV term in the thermodynamics equation. In other words, the energy in the region decreases not just because of dilution, but also because part of the energy is used to "push" the matter outside the region.

My question is, where has the energy that used to "push" the matter outside the region gone? Obviously energy has to be conserved. So the lost energy must have gone to somewhere.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can this be fixed by including a cosmological constant ?

If not, it looks like a case of lack of global energy conservation in GR.
 
What do you mean by including a cosmological constant?
This equation can be obtained by eliminating the cosmological constant from the other two Friedman Equations. So I guess cosmological constant is irrelavant here.

I think this is a local energy conservation problem - we are considering a "small" region in space, where energy flow out of the region to its neighbour.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
paultsui said:
What do you mean by including a cosmological constant?
This equation can be obtained by eliminating the cosmological constant from the other two Friedman Equations. So I guess cosmological constant is irrelavant here.
OK.

I think this is a local energy conservation problem - we are considering a "small" region in space, where energy flow out of the region to its neighbour.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Locally the energy has gone to some neighbours. I guess the divergence of the flow is zero so it must be escaping at the boundary.
 
paultsui said:
Obviously energy has to be conserved.
Unfortunately energy as an integral over a 3-volume cannot even be defined in an expanding universe.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top