Conservation of Energy: Kinetic to Elastic Potential

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving energy conservation between kinetic and elastic potential energy. A 0.150-kg frame stretches a spring when a 0.200-kg lump of putty is dropped onto it from a height of 30.0m. The initial calculations for spring constant and velocity of the putty are noted, but the final answers of 0.2m or 0.25m are incorrect. The error lies in not accounting for the combined kinetic energy of the putty and frame immediately after the collision. Correctly calculating the speed of the putty-frame combination after impact will lead to the accurate solution.
awelex
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.150-kg frame, when suspended from a coil spring, stretches the spring 0.050m. A 0.200-kg lump of putty is dropped from rest onto the frame from a height of 30.0m.

mass of frame: mf
mass of putty: mp
height: h


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the following, which was wrong:

0.150 * 9.8 = k * 0.050 --> k = 29.4

velocity of putty when it touches frame:
0.200*g*0.3=(1/2)*0.200*v^2 --> v^2 = 2hg

(1/2)(mp+mf)*v^2 = (1/2)*k*x^2
--> x = 0.2m

So the final answer is either 0.2m or 0.25m (depending on whether one adds the initial 0.05m). Both answers are wrong, though. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
awelex said:

Homework Statement


A 0.150-kg frame, when suspended from a coil spring, stretches the spring 0.050m. A 0.200-kg lump of putty is dropped from rest onto the frame from a height of 30.0m.

mass of frame: mf
mass of putty: mp
height: h

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the following, which was wrong:

0.150 * 9.8 = k * 0.050 --> k = 29.4

velocity of putty when it touches frame:
0.200*g*0.3=(1/2)*0.200*v^2 --> v^2 = 2hg
You're fine up to here. I take it that h=30 cm, not 30 m like you wrote above.
(1/2)(mp+mf)*v^2 = (1/2)*k*x^2
--> x = 0.2m

So the final answer is either 0.2m or 0.25m (depending on whether one adds the initial 0.05m). Both answers are wrong, though. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks.
You're assuming that both the frame and the putty are initially moving with the speed the putty had just before hitting the frame. So right before the collision, the putty has a certain amount of kinetic energy, and immediately after the collision, it still has that amount of kinetic energy because it still has speed v. But now the frame is moving too, so there's even more kinetic energy. Does that make sense?

You need to find the speed of the putty-frame combination immediately after the collision. If you use that speed in your calculations instead, you should get the right answer.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
883
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
864
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K