Conservation of Energy on Inclined Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the equation 1/2kx^2 = mgh, which relates the potential energy of a spring to gravitational potential energy. It emphasizes that both forms of energy cannot be zero simultaneously, as energy is conserved and one must be at a maximum when the other is at a minimum. The participants clarify that the equation represents energy at different points in a system, with the left side reflecting the spring's energy and the right side representing gravitational energy at a height. The importance of defining reference points and the relationship between compression distance (x) and height (h) is highlighted. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the conservation of energy in this context.
lajohn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am confused about something.

I understand how one gets the equation 1/2kx^2=mgh, and so if 1/2kx^2=0, then mgh=0, but this doesn't make sense to me. Isn't it true the energy is converted, so it's impossible to have both equal zero? One could equal zero, and the other would be at a max, or vice versa on the other end of the spectrum, but not BOTH equal zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be nice to tell us what you are talking about!

I assume that you have a spring since you have "1/2 k x<sup>2</sup>", the work necessary to compress a spring a distance x from its equilibrium position and so the potential energy there (relative to at the equilibrium position). Clearly mgh is the potential energy due to height h above some reference point. You say "I understand how one gets the equation 1/2kx^2=mgh" but I don't even understand what it MEANS since you haven't told us where the reference point is or how x is connected to h.
 
in the equation: .5kx^2=mgh, notice that both of these energies are not for the initial or the final point, the left side is the energy of the start point that we only got spring, and the right side is mgh, which is in the final place and there is no spring...
i hope I've understood your question correctly..
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top