Conservation of Energy when lifting a box up off the floor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy when lifting a box, highlighting the confusion between work done and energy conservation principles. It clarifies that the work-energy theorem states the total work done on an object equals the change in its kinetic energy, rather than mechanical energy being conserved. When a force greater than gravity lifts the box, the work done by the force and gravity must be accounted for separately. The equation derived shows that the sum of changes in kinetic and potential energy is not constant, indicating energy is not conserved in this scenario. Ultimately, the error lies in misapplying conservation principles in a situation where they do not apply.
nav888
Messages
38
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Writing a conservation of energy statement
Relevant Equations
W = mgh
E = 1/2 mv^2
So, I cannot for the life of me write a conservation of energy statement, when an object is lifted up by a force. So in my example there is a box on the floor with v = 0, and then a force of magnitude F, where F > mg, acts on the ball, now the net force is F-mg, and hence the work done is (F - mg) h where h is the vertical height, Now I thought that the work done is equal to the energy of the ball, and hence (F - mg) h = 1/2mv^2 + mgh.
But this isnt correct, could someone please help explain?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please read your post and correct ...
 
BvU said:
Please read your post and correct ...
? I have come here for help I cannot correct my work or I would not ask for help? Sorry
 
@nav888 I hope I understood your problem correctly.
##W_{total}=\Delta K=\frac 1 2 m(v^2_f-v^2_i)##
In your example ##v_i=0## so the total work is : ##W_{total}=\frac 1 2 mv^2_f##
nav888 said:
(F - mg) h = 1/2mv^2 + mgh.
If there is no air resistance and only these 2 forces are acting on the object you can calculate total work easily:
##W_{total}=F_{net}dcos\theta=(F-mg)h=\frac 1 2 mv^2_f##

Your answer has an extra mgh:
(F - mg) h = 1/2mv^2 + mgh.

Edit: Note that The work-energy theorem states that the total work done on an object equals the change in its kinetic energy.
 
What you need is the work-energy theorem because mechanical energy (kinetic plus potential) is not conserved. The work-energy theorem says that the sum of the works done by all the forces is equal to the change in kinetic energy. If (constant) external force ##F## lifts the mass to height ##h## from rest, there are two forces doing work on the mass, gravity and ##F##. So you write
##W_g=-mgh## (negative work because the displacement and the force are in opposite directions)
##W_F=Fh## (positive work because the displacement and the force are in the same direction)
##W_{total}=W_g+W_F=Fh-mgh##
Thus, by the work-energy theorem $$\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2=Fh-mgh.$$Now the change in potential energy is ##\Delta U = mgh.## If you move that to the other side of the equation and change sign, you get $$\Delta K+\Delta U=Fh.$$ The above equation says that the sum of the changes in kinetic plus potential energy changes, as the mass is lifted, is not constant. If mechanical energy were conserved, then the sum of the two changes must be zero.

So you cannot, for the life of you, write an energy conservation equation simply because you chose a situation where energy is not conserved.
 
Last edited:
Another way of looking at it:
Posts #4 and #5 correctly analyse it in terms of the work done on the mass.
Alternatively, consider the work done by the force on the mass/Earth system. The gained potential energy is internal energy of that system:
##Fh=\frac 12mv^2+mgh##.
So your error can be thought of as mixing up the two views.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top