Conservation of linear momentum in this system

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed scenario, a pet mouse walking on a stationary turntable raises questions about the conservation of linear momentum. Initially, both the mouse and turntable have zero momentum, but as the mouse moves, its momentum increases while the turntable remains stationary. The discussion highlights that the axle, if considered part of the system, exerts a normal force on the turntable, preventing external forces from altering the system's momentum. If the axle has finite mass, it moves in response to the mouse's motion, maintaining the overall momentum at zero. However, if the axle is infinitely massive, it acts as a momentum sink, complicating the momentum calculations.
undividable
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A pet mouse sleeps near the eastern edge of a stationary, horizontal turntable that is supported by a frictionless,
vertical axle through its center. The mouse wakes up and starts to walk north on the turntable. Is the momentum of the system constant?
i understand that the initial momentum is zero, because the turntable and the mouse have v=0, and that the final momentum is not zero, since v≠0 for the mouse, and v=0 for the turntable, so linear momentum is not conserved, but since ∫∑Fext dt=dp, where is the external netforce (∑Fext) that causes the change in the system's momentum? It seems to me there are none. only internal forces (friction) between the mouse and the turntable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
undividable said:
where is the external netforce (∑Fext) that causes the change in the system's momentum
The axle
 
Dale said:
The axle

so, as the mouse moves upward, the axle exerts and external force (normal downward force) on the turntable so it stays with v=0? and if the axle was a part of the system? the linear momentum should still change, but now the external net force would be is 0
 
undividable said:
so, as the mouse moves upward, the axle exerts and external force (normal downward force) on the turntable so it stays with v=0? and if the axle was a part of the system? the linear momentum should still change, but now the external net force would be is 0
If the axle has finite mass, it will move south along with the wheel while the mouse moves north. Net linear momentum of the system (including axle) remains zero.

If the axle has infinite mass, it is an infinite momentum sink. Its momentum cannot be calculated by measuring zero velocity and crying "Eureka: zero momentum".
 
undividable said:
and if the axle was a part of the system?
Then identify the forces acting on the axle and apply Newton's laws.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top