Conservation of momentum and Energy

AI Thread Summary
In an isolated system, momentum is always conserved, but energy can change forms, especially during inelastic collisions where kinetic energy may decrease while other forms of energy, like rotational energy, can increase. The temperature of the system is related to the average kinetic energy, but other energy storage methods, known as "degrees of freedom," also contribute to the total energy. Each degree of freedom corresponds to a specific amount of energy, meaning that energy is not lost but redistributed among different forms. Inelastic collisions do not result in energy disappearing; rather, they shift energy between kinetic and other forms, maintaining the overall energy balance in the system. Understanding these dynamics clarifies that energy conservation holds true even when kinetic energy appears to be lost.
MotoPayton
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
In an isolated system, momentum is conserved. I understand this. However, I also learned that that the motion and energy of the particles inside of an isolated system is defined by the average kinetic energy (temperature).

Do we have to assume that every collision is elastic and that kinetic energy is always conserved?

If there are inelastic collisions inside of the the system what happens to the energy?
Does the temperature of the system remain constant? How could it if energy is lost?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes we have to assume energy is never lost it is conserved, it merely changes form. The terms are elastic the energy is not.

If energy is lost in that system then the temperature falls. Momentum is conserved in the same way energy is, it is transferred as energy that is lost from the system. It might for example heat the air around it. Overall if we take the whole system into account nothing is lost.
 
Last edited:
MotoPayton said:
In an isolated system, momentum is conserved. I understand this. However, I also learned that that the motion and energy of the particles inside of an isolated system is defined by the average kinetic energy (temperature).

Do we have to assume that every collision is elastic and that kinetic energy is always conserved?

If there are inelastic collisions inside of the the system what happens to the energy?
Does the temperature of the system remain constant? How could it if energy is lost?

Thanks for the help.

There are ways for a gas (or any material) to hold energy other than kinetic energy. A hydrogen molecule (composed of two atoms) can spin like a top, for example. A single atom can have one of its electrons kicked up to a higher energy level as the result of a collision. If a collision occurs between two non-rotating molecules and makes one molecule rotate, the total kinetic energy of the two colliding particles will be less than the total kinetic energy before, but the total kinetic energy plus the energy of rotation will be equal to the kinetic energy before. On the other hand, a molecule colliding with a rotating molecule might pick up energy from the rotating molecule, with the rotating molecule losing rotational energy. Then the total kinetic energy of the colliding particles will be greater after the collision than before. But again, the total energy will be the same.

Saying that the temperature is proportional to the average kinetic energy is mostly true, but not the whole picture. These other ways for an atom or a molecule to store energy are called "degrees of freedom". If you have just point atoms that cannot have any energy except kinetic energy, then it has 3 degrees of freedom - x, y, and z - the number of coordinates you need to specify its position. If it can rotate, like a diatomic molecule, you need 2 more to specify its orientation, so it has 5 degrees of freedom.

The best way to think of the relationship between energy and temperature is that each degree of freedom has energy kT/2. So a gas of point atoms has energy 3kT/2 per atom. A diatomic gas has energy 5kT/2 per molecule. So if you have inelastic collisions, the energy doesn't "go" anywhere, because its already there. Every collision can give stored energy to kinetic energy, or kinetic energy to stored energy. When everything is at equilibrium the rates are the same, and there is no change in the total stored energy or kinetic energy.

The simple picture above is for "classical" atoms and molecules. In reality, the rotation of a diatomic gas is a quantum phenomenon, which means the energy stored is in discrete amounts, not continuous. If the temperature gets low enough, this can interfere with the idea that there is energy kT/2 per degree of freedom. But you can worry about that later.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top