Conservation of Momentum (Explosion Kinematics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum in an explosion scenario involving a space vehicle and a lifeboat. Participants debate why both the space vehicle and the lifeboat maintain a horizontal velocity of 300 m/s after the lifeboat is fired at 1000 m/s northward. It is clarified that the lifeboat retains a horizontal component equal to the vehicle's due to the conservation of momentum, despite its vertical velocity change. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding directional references in space, where "north" and "east" are treated as perpendicular directions rather than geographical terms. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the horizontal velocity remains unchanged for both objects due to the principles of momentum conservation.
jay2001
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A 3200 kg space vehicle (including a launchable lifeboat) is traveling with a velocity of 300 m/s in a straight trajectory [East]. The lifeboat (200 kg) is fired at a speed of 1000 m/s [N of original trajectory].
a) After firing it is found that the horizontal component of each object’s velocity is still 300 m/s [along original trajectory]. Explain why.

Homework Equations



p = p'
p = mv

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
More of a theory question than problem solving... but I'm stumped on this. I feel like they shouldn't both have horizontal velocity components of 300 m/s - I believe that the lifeboat should have a velocity of 1000 m/s [N] (so a horizontal velocity component of zero), and the space vehicle would be redirected slightly South of East, so the horizontal velocity component would change from 300 m/s. Am I wrong, or just misunderstanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jay2001 said:
I'm stumped on this
Think about what "north" and "east" etc. might mean in space.

Btw, you mean kinetics, not kinematics.
 
Make sure that you understand linear momentum conservation properly and come back to the question after thoroughly understanding the concept :)
 
ubergewehr273 said:
Make sure that you understand linear momentum conservation properly and come back to the question after thoroughly understanding the concept :)
I see no evidence that @jay2001 does not understand the concept, do you?
 
jay2001 said:
I believe that the lifeboat should have a velocity of 1000 m/s [N] (so a horizontal velocity component of zero)
Are you sure? Mind the lifeboat is moving along with the vehicle just before the launch.
jay2001 said:
and the space vehicle would be redirected slightly South of East, so the horizontal velocity component would change from 300 m/s.
The rocket can still redirect slightly South of East with the horizontal component of velocity fixed. What if the vertical component changes only? ##\ddot\smile##
 
jay2001 said:
A 3200 kg space vehicle (including a launchable lifeboat) is traveling with a velocity of 300 m/s in a straight trajectory [East]. The lifeboat (200 kg) is fired at a speed of 1000 m/s [N of original trajectory].
a) After firing it is found that the horizontal component of each object’s velocity is still 300 m/s [along original trajectory]. Explain why.
From momentum conservation
p=p1+p2,
or,p2=p12+p22+
2p1horizontalp2

From energy conservation
p2/2m=p12/2m1+p22/2m2
Where p is the momentum of the system before disintegration and p1 and p2 are the momentum of the lifeboat and space vehicle respectively.

Now p,p1 horizontal,
p1vertical and p2 is given in the question.
 
Apashanka said:
From momentum conservation
p=p1+p2,
or,p2=p12+p22+
2p1horizontalp2

From energy conservation
p2/2m=p12/2m1+p22/2m2
Where p is the momentum of the system before disintegration and p1 and p2 are the momentum of the lifeboat and space vehicle respectively.

Now p,p1 horizontal,
p1vertical and p2 is given in the question.
You do not appear to have understood the question. Nothing in your post helps.
Did you read post #2?
 
haruspex said:
Think about what "north" and "east" etc. might mean in space
North and east only means the direction that are perpendicular to each other ,nothing to do with north and South in space.
 
haruspex said:
Did you read post #2?
Yaa I have read it .
It only implies the mutually perpendicular direction ,nothing to confuse with the north and east of geography.
 
  • #10
jay2001 said:
A 3200 kg space vehicle (including a launchable lifeboat) is traveling with a velocity of 300 m/s in a straight trajectory [East]. The lifeboat (200 kg) is fired at a speed of 1000 m/s [N of original trajectory].
a) After firing it is found that the horizontal component of each object’s velocity is still 300 m/s [along original trajectory]. Explain why.
To an observer who is sitting on the space vehicle he will see a horizontal velocity of lifeboat(being equal to that of space vehicle in the negative direction)as well as a vertical component of velocity of the lifeboat(given).
To an observer at absolute rest(reference frame) at the moment the life boat is launched he will see a horizontal component of velocity of lifeboat (being equal to that of space vehicle in the positive direction)and as well as vertical component of velocity of the lifeboat.(given).
 
  • #11
Apashanka said:
North and east only means the direction that are perpendicular to each other ,nothing to do with north and South in space.
and how might that relate to the "horizontal" information?
(Do you think you have an answer to the question posed?)
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
and how might that relate to the "horizontal" information?
Horizontal actually here may be referred to the plane in which the objects are moving or rather direction along the straight line of the motion as given in question ,and vertical refers perpendicular to this direction
 
  • #13
Apashanka said:
Horizontal actually here may be referred to the plane in which the objects are moving or rather direction along the straight line of the motion as given in question ,and vertical refers perpendicular to this direction
But how does that relate to the East and North references? Are you saying they are both horizontal?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
But how does that relate to the East and North refernces? Are you saying they are both horizontal?
For an exm. you may take your right hand to be east direction and forehead to be north direction ,and space vehicle is moving along right hand and lifeboat is ejected along forehead.
Horizontal is along right hand and vertical is along forehead.
 
  • #15
Apashanka said:
For an exm. you may take your right hand to be east direction and forehead to be north direction ,and space vehicle is moving along right hand and lifeboat is ejected along forehead.
Horizontal is along right hand and vertical is along forehead.
Or in 2-D Cartesian x is east(horizontal) and y is north (vertical).
 
  • #16
Apashanka said:
For an exm. you may take your right hand to be east direction and forehead to be north direction ,and space vehicle is moving along right hand and lifeboat is ejected along forehead.
Horizontal is along right hand and vertical is along forehead.
Yes, that's the key, but there was no hint of that in post #6.
Also, I feel the question setter had something a bit more specific in mind which would lead to that interpretation of how N and E relate to horizontal and vertical.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top