Conservation of Momentum involving a space ship blowing up into three pieces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum after a spaceship explodes into three pieces. The initial mass of the spaceship and the velocities of two pieces are provided, with the goal of determining the speed of the third piece. Participants clarify that the mass of the third piece should be calculated as the total mass minus the masses of the other two pieces, and emphasize the importance of correctly assigning positive and negative values to velocities based on direction. After addressing errors in calculations and understanding the momentum equation, the user successfully finds the correct speed for the third piece. The conversation highlights the significance of careful consideration of direction and mass in momentum problems.
SherBear
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spaceship of mass 2.30×10^6kg is cruising at a speed of 5.40×10^6m/s when the antimatter reactor fails, blowing the ship into three pieces. One section, having a mass of 5.20×10^5kg, is blown straight backward with a speed of 2.20×10^6m/s. A second piece, with mass 7.80×10^5kg, continues forward at 1.20×10^6m/s.

What is the speed of the third piece? in m/s


Homework Equations


M3=m3=M-m1+m2

Conservation of Momentum says:

m1v1+m2v2+m3v3=MV


The Attempt at a Solution



To get the weight of the third piece i used
M3=m3=M-m1+m2=
2.30*10^6kg - 5.20*10^5 kg + 7.80*10^5kg= 2.56*10^6 kg

Then
m1v1+m2v2+m3v3=MV

(5.20*10^5kg)(2.20*10^6)+(7.80*10^5kg)(1.20*10^6 m/s)+(2.56*10^6 kg) V3 = (2.30*10^6kg)(5.40*10^6ms)=

This may sound dumb but I don't know how to do this equation

I have 1.44*10^12 + 9.36*10^11 + 2.50*10^6

2.0800025*10^12 = 1.242*10^13

Then do I divide those 2, if so I get 1.67*10^-1 and it's wrong

What am I doing wrong?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SherBear said:
To get the weight of the third piece i used
M3=m3=M-m1+m2=
2.30*10^6kg - 5.20*10^5 kg + 7.80*10^5kg= 2.56*10^6 kg
Shouldn't that be: m3 = M - m1 - m2 ?
 
Doc Al said:
Shouldn't that be: m3 = M - m1 - m2 ?

I don't know, that piece is going to the right which is to the east and I'm calling that way positive?
 
SherBear said:
I don't know, that piece is going to the right which is to the east and I'm calling that way positive?

It is positive just a mistake, I added it in the equation.
 
SherBear said:
I don't know, that piece is going to the right which is to the east and I'm calling that way positive?
The direction of motion doesn't affect the mass. (It affects momentum, of course.)
 
Doc Al said:
The direction of motion doesn't affect the mass. (It affects momentum, of course.)

I tried subtracting that and I have
1*10^6kg for mass 3

When i plugged it into the conservation I still get 1.67*10^-1 ?
 
SherBear said:
I tried subtracting that and I have
1*10^6kg for mass 3
Good.

When i plugged it into the conservation I still get 1.67*10^-1 ?
How can you get the same answer with different numbers?

SherBear said:
Then
m1v1+m2v2+m3v3=MV

(5.20*10^5kg)(2.20*10^6)+(7.80*10^5kg)(1.20*10^6 m/s)+(2.56*10^6 kg) V3 = (2.30*10^6kg)(5.40*10^6ms)=
Two problems:
(1) As already pointed out, you have the wrong value for the mass of the third piece.
(2) You didn't incorporate the direction of motion. Things that go forward should have + velocity; things that go backward should have -.
 
Doc Al said:
Good.


How can you get the same answer with different numbers?


Two problems:
(1) As already pointed out, you have the wrong value for the mass of the third piece.
(2) You didn't incorporate the direction of motion. Things that go forward should have + velocity; things that go backward should have -.

Ok m1 is positive and v1 is negative because it's going backwards?
m2 positive because it's weight, and m2 is positive because it's going forwards?
m3 doesn't matter because it's weight...then solve to get v3?
 
SherBear said:
Ok m1 is positive and v1 is negative because it's going backwards?
m2 positive because it's weight, and m2 is positive because it's going forwards?
m3 doesn't matter because it's weight...then solve to get v3?
Almost: Masses are always positive, regardless of direction.

v1 is negative, v2 is positive. v3 you will solve for.
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
Almost: Masses are always positive, regardless of direction.

v1 is negative, v2 is positive. v3 you will solve for.

Ok good, the only value i had to change was v1 to negative because it is going to the left or to the west.

it made V1 value negative

(5.20*10^5)(-1.144*10^12)+(9.36*10^11)+(1*10^6)=(2.30*10^6kg)(5.40*10^6m/s)

i get -1.69*10^-2, is this correct?
 
  • #11
SherBear said:
Ok good, the only value i had to change was v1 to negative because it is going to the left or to the west.

it made V1 value negative

(5.20*10^5)(-1.144*10^12)+(9.36*10^11)+(1*10^6)=(2.30*10^6kg)(5.40*10^6m/s)

i get -1.69*10^-2, is this correct?

oopse disregard the (5.20*10^5), my mistake
 
  • #12
SherBear said:
Ok good, the only value i had to change was v1 to negative because it is going to the left or to the west.

it made V1 value negative

(5.20*10^5)(-1.144*10^12)+(9.36*10^11)+(1*10^6)=(2.30*10^6kg)(5.40*10^6m/s)

i get -1.69*10^-2, is this correct?

I was able to use a more simple way and now it's correct, thanks!
 
Back
Top