Conservation of Momentum when an Object Rebounds

AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly elastic collision, such as a ball bouncing off a wall, momentum is not conserved for the ball alone due to the external force exerted by the wall. The ball's momentum changes direction as it collides with the wall, but when considering the ball and the Earth as a single system, momentum is conserved overall. The collision results in a negligible change in the Earth's velocity, which balances the momentum change of the ball. This highlights the principle that momentum conservation applies to the entire system rather than isolated objects. Understanding this concept clarifies the dynamics of momentum in elastic collisions.
Mikry
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is my first post(of hopefully many!), so I hope I've made this thread in the right subforum...

Anyway! Let me set the scene:
Say you throw a ball against a wall, a perfectly elastic collision takes place and the ball bounces back off the wall with the same speed.

Now I understand the mechanics of this in terms of kenetic and potencial energy: the kenetic energy is turned into some form of potencial energy and then converted into kenetic energy again.

But I can't seem to wrap my mind around what's going on with the momentum in this situation. The momentum travels in one direction before it hits the wall, and then afterwards it travels in the complete opposite direction. I don't understand how the momentum is being conserved or what the external force is that's causing the momentum to change...

Could someone please explain what's going on there? :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is conserved when there is no external force acting on the system. In this case, the momentum of the ball is not conserved because it is acted on by a force from the wall.

Now, if you consider the ball and the whole Earth all as one system then for the collision there is no external force. So to conserve momentum the ball must have produced some miniscule change in the velocity of the earth.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top