Conservation of momentum when two objects collide

AI Thread Summary
In collisions, while some kinetic energy may convert to heat and transfer to individual particles, total linear momentum remains conserved and is solely represented by the momentum of the center of mass. The total kinetic energy of colliding objects is conserved, but it can shift between center-of-mass and internal degrees of freedom. Angular momentum, however, can be divided into orbital and spin components, with total angular momentum conserved despite potential transfers to internal angular momentum. If particles are lost during a collision, they can carry away momentum, but as long as the bulk mass remains intact, its momentum equals the sum of its constituent particles' momenta. Thus, momentum is not lost to internal degrees of freedom in a collision.
member 529879
when two objects collide some kinetic energy can be lost to heat, so some of the kinetic energy of the two colliding objects transfers to the individual particles of these objects. Does the same thing happen for momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's illuminating to consider the center of masses of each of these objects.

For each object:
KE_{object} = KE_{CM} + KE_{internal}

As you say, the total kinetic energy of a pair of objects is conserved in a collision, though energy may be transferred between the center-of-mass degree of freedom, and internal degrees of freedom.

As for as momentum goes, the total linear momentum of an object can be expressed just as the momentum of its center of mass. So no linear momentum is lost to internal degrees of freedom in a collision.

However, angular momentum breaks up into (orbital) angular momentum of the center of mass, and (spin) angular momentum with respect to the center of mass:
L_{total}=L_{CM} + L_{internal}

So in a collision, the total angular momentum is conserved, though some may be transferred to internal angular momentum. The objects could glance off each other, and be spinning as a result.
 
But linear momentum is not lost to internal linear momentum? If the atoms can have more kinetic energy after a collision would that also mean that they have more momentum?
 
The atoms of an object can be moving around the center of mass of the object, but if you add up all those momenta, the parts of the object moving forward plus the parts of the object moving backward ass up to a total momentum that is just the total mass times the velocity of the center of mass.
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
If some particles are lost in the collision (as fragments or radiation), they can carry some momentum away. But as long as a bulk mass stays intact, the momentum of the bulk mass is just the sum of momenta of its constituent particles.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top