Conservation of the volume form

relativityfan
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
hi,

is it true that for any valid spacetime in general relativity that:
if time dilated/contracted by k, space is contracted/dilated by k?

what is the mathematical explanation for this?

therefore, if one knows the time dilation for a point in spacetime, then one knows automatically the length contraction?

for the Kerr metric, the problem is that at the event horizon of a black hole space is infinitely contracted but time does not seem infinitely dilated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
relativityfan said:
hi,

is it true that for any valid spacetime in general relativity that:
if time dilated/contracted by k, space is contracted/dilated by k?
There are solutions of the field equations where this is not true.

Dust solutions usually have g00=-1, for instance. It isn't true generally for Weyl vacuums either.
 
really?
but the time dilation does not occur only for g_00, the determinant of the metric must be evaluated.
could you provide or link to a full example of such metric tensor, that is physically valid?
 
relativityfan said:
is it true that for any valid spacetime in general relativity that:
if time dilated/contracted by k, space is contracted/dilated by k?

I'm assuming you are referring to so-called "gravitational" dilation, and not the "special-relativistic" time dilation/length contraction due to motion.

Well, there is simple counter-example to your proposition: the "Rindler metric"

ds^2 = \frac{a^2 x^2}{c^2} dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2​

in which there is "gravitational" time dilation but no change in spatial distance. If you are not familiar with Rindler coordinates, they are coordinates relative to a rigidly accelerating rocket in flat spacetime (i.e. no gravity apart from the "artificial" gravity experienced by the rocket's occupants).

(The Rindler metric is just the Minkowski metric expressed relative to another coordinate system.)

This shows that gravitational time dilation depends on your choice of coordinates and is not an intrinsic (i.e. frame-independent) property of a spacetime.
 
thank you,
well the coordinate t in this Rindler metric is not time but a combination of space and time

the time dilation is of course not frame independant, but if you change the coordinates SYSTEM and not the spacetime position/frame of the observer, the lorentz factor must remain the same

sorry, but I have still not any convincing example.
for me the gravitationnal time dilation is just a consequence of special relativity: its exactly the same phenomena
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
922
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top