Conservative Vector Fields - Is this right?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
Conservative Vector Fields -- Is this right?

Homework Statement



G = <(1 + x)e[tex]^{x+y}[/tex], xe[tex]^{x+y}[/tex]+2z, -2y>
Evaluate [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{C}[/tex]G.dR
where C is the path given by:

x = (1 - t)e[tex]^{t}[/tex], y = t, z = 2t, 1=>t>=0

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



First, i noticed that there is a scalar potential associated with several terms (not all) in
the above vector field:

[tex]\varphi[/tex] = xe[tex]^{x + y}[/tex]
[tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\varphi[/tex] = <(1 + x)e[tex]^{x + y}[/tex], xe[tex]^{x + y}[/tex],0>

So, i then separated the initial vector field G into two parts:

G=<0, 2z, -2y> + <(1 + x)e[tex]^{x + y}[/tex], xe[tex]^{x + y}[/tex],0>

First, I compute some derivatives and then evaluate the first line integral:
[tex]\frac{dc}{dt}[/tex] =
{dx = -te[tex]^{t}[/tex]dt
dy = 1dt
dz = 2dt}


so,

[tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{C}[/tex]G[tex]_{1}[/tex] . [tex]\frac{dc}{dt}[/tex]dt =
[tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{1}_{0}[/tex]<0, 2(2t), -2(t)> . <-te[tex]^{t}[/tex], 1, 2>
=

[tex]\int[/tex]0dt = 0

I then computed the second part of G, keeping in mind that this portion of the vector field is conservative. Therefore, i just made a path from point t = 0 to t = 1 with a straight line r, parametrized like so:

r = { x = 1-t, y = t, z = 2t}
[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex] = {dx = -1, dy = 1, dz = 2}

my second integral then becomes;

[tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{1}_{0}[/tex]<(1 + 1 - t)e[tex]^{1 - t + t}[/tex], (1-t)e[tex]^{1-t + t}[/tex],0> . <-1, 1, 2> dt = [tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{1}_{0}[/tex]<(2-t)e, (1-t)e,0> . <-1, 1, 2> dt =

So, is my final answer simply this integral evaluated, or am I doing this completely wrong? Sorry if this is a bad question, my book just has no example problems at all, and integrating the theory can be confusing. Any feedback would be appreciated greatly. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The final answer that i got was -e, by computing this integral and adding the two portions (o & -e)
 
Great, thanks. I don't want anyone to check the details, I just wanted to see if what I was doing was reasonable, or if i was doing it completely wrong.
 
Thanks a lot, I appreciate the help!