Conservative Vector Fields - Is this right?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a line integral of a vector field, specifically focusing on the vector field G = <(1 + x)e^{x+y}, xe^{x+y}+2z, -2y>. The original poster is attempting to determine the correctness of their approach to solving the integral along a specified path.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster separates the vector field into two parts, identifies a scalar potential for part of the field, and computes derivatives for the line integral. They question whether their final answer is correct and express uncertainty about their approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants have indicated that the original poster's approach appears reasonable, while others have confirmed obtaining the same final result. There is an ongoing exploration of the correctness of the methods used without a definitive consensus on the evaluation process.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of example problems in their textbook, which contributes to their confusion about integrating the theory with practical application.

EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
Conservative Vector Fields -- Is this right?

Homework Statement



G = <(1 + x)e^{x+y}, xe^{x+y}+2z, -2y>
Evaluate \int_{C}G.dR
where C is the path given by:

x = (1 - t)e^{t}, y = t, z = 2t, 1=>t>=0

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



First, i noticed that there is a scalar potential associated with several terms (not all) in
the above vector field:

\varphi = xe^{x + y}
\nabla\varphi = <(1 + x)e^{x + y}, xe^{x + y},0>

So, i then separated the initial vector field G into two parts:

G=<0, 2z, -2y> + <(1 + x)e^{x + y}, xe^{x + y},0>

First, I compute some derivatives and then evaluate the first line integral:
\frac{dc}{dt} =
{dx = -te^{t}dt
dy = 1dt
dz = 2dt}


so,

\int_{C}G_{1} . \frac{dc}{dt}dt =
\int^{1}_{0}<0, 2(2t), -2(t)> . <-te^{t}, 1, 2>
=

\int0dt = 0

I then computed the second part of G, keeping in mind that this portion of the vector field is conservative. Therefore, i just made a path from point t = 0 to t = 1 with a straight line r, parametrized like so:

r = { x = 1-t, y = t, z = 2t}
\frac{dr}{dt} = {dx = -1, dy = 1, dz = 2}

my second integral then becomes;

\int^{1}_{0}<(1 + 1 - t)e^{1 - t + t}, (1-t)e^{1-t + t},0> . <-1, 1, 2> dt = \int^{1}_{0}<(2-t)e, (1-t)e,0> . <-1, 1, 2> dt =

So, is my final answer simply this integral evaluated, or am I doing this completely wrong? Sorry if this is a bad question, my book just has no example problems at all, and integrating the theory can be confusing. Any feedback would be appreciated greatly. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like a reasonable approach to me. I didn't check all of the details, though.
 
The final answer that i got was -e, by computing this integral and adding the two portions (o & -e)
 
Great, thanks. I don't want anyone to check the details, I just wanted to see if what I was doing was reasonable, or if i was doing it completely wrong.
 
I get -e as well.
 
Thanks a lot, I appreciate the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
2K