Conserved Momentum Problem: Finding Velocity of a Block on a Slope

  • Thread starter Thread starter ippo90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a box sliding down a frictionless slope and the conservation of momentum and energy. The participants analyze how to calculate the final velocities of both the box and the slope after the box reaches the horizontal plane. Key points include the need to express the velocities in terms of their components and to apply conservation laws correctly, particularly focusing on the horizontal momentum and the total energy of the system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between velocities relative to the slope and those relative to the ground. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using both conservation of energy and momentum equations to derive the final velocities accurately.
ippo90
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A box with mass m is on the top of a slope with angle alpha. Every surface has no friction. Assume that the system starts off from resting position. The start position of the box is P, and has a height h over the horizontal plane. Find the velocity of the block with the slope when the box has reached the horizontal plane ground. The mass of the slope block is M.

Homework Equations


-I believe that the relevant eq. are:
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

where v1' and v2' are the velocities after a collision etc.

-law of energy: 1/2mv2=mgh

-definitions of cosine and sine

-timeless eq for velocity: v2=vo2+2as

The Attempt at a Solution


Because we are assuming that the system starts off from resting state, v1 and v2=0
hence mv1'=(m+M)v2' [they will move in different directions]

we want to find v2'. Therefore I tried to express v1' in terms of angle, height. It turned out to be all wrong. What did i do wrong?

I hope someone will help me with this. I've used like 3 hours or so..

thank you
 

Attachments

  • problem pic.jpg
    problem pic.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
ippo90 said:
-I believe that the relevant eq. are:
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

where v1' and v2' are the velocities after a collision etc.
OK.

-law of energy: 1/2mv2=mgh
OK, but be sure to consider the total energy of the system.

-definitions of cosine and sine

-timeless eq for velocity: v2=vo2+2as
Not needed.

Because we are assuming that the system starts off from resting state, v1 and v2=0
hence mv1'=(m+M)v2' [they will move in different directions]
How did you arrive at this result from your conservation of momentum equation above?
 
The equation used is this:
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

since the system starts from resting state v1 (start velocity of box) and v2(start velocity of the slope) are 0. this gives the equation:

m1v1'+m2v2'=0

the velocity of the box, when it reaches the end is v1'. the momentum for the box will be m1v1'. for the slope the velocity will be -v2' since it will probably move the opposite direction. the momentum will therefore be -(m+M)v2' (since the box is still on the slope when reaching the ground).

hence I got that eq. Have I done a something wrong here?
 
ippo90 said:
The equation used is this:
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

since the system starts from resting state v1 (start velocity of box) and v2(start velocity of the slope) are 0. this gives the equation:

m1v1'+m2v2'=0
Good.

the velocity of the box, when it reaches the end is v1'. the momentum for the box will be m1v1'.
Still good.
for the slope the velocity will be -v2' since it will probably move the opposite direction.
You've already defined the velocity of the wedge to be v2'. I suspect that you mean that v2' will be in the opposite direction of v1'. True!
the momentum will therefore be -(m+M)v2' (since the box is still on the slope when reaching the ground).
No. This actually contradicts your equation above.

Hint: Just worry about the final speeds of everything after they part company.
 
Doc Al said:
Hint: Just worry about the final speeds of everything after they part company.
At least I assume that that's what they want. If I'm wrong, let me know. (They do give the angle alpha, which is not needed in my interpretation of the problem.)
 
you mean like mv1'=Mv2'?

v2'=mv1'/M

BTW the answer does contain some cosine(alpha) and sine
 
ippo90 said:
you mean like mv1'=Mv2'?

v2'=mv1'/M
Yes.

BTW the answer does contain some cosine(alpha) and sine
That means that my assumption was wrong. They want the speed of the wedge when the sliding mass is still on the wedge, just when it reaches the bottom.

Sorry about that! :redface:

This is a bit more complicated.

Hint: Only the horizontal component of momentum is conserved.
 
which means I have to find the x component of the box' velocity?

if so I used the energy law to calculate v when sliding down.

v=sqroot(2gh)

I used this to find vx=vcos(a)=sqroot(2gh)cos(a)

am I on the right track?
 
ippo90 said:
which means I have to find the x component of the box' velocity?
It means you'll be using the x component of the box's velocity in your conservation of momentum equation.

if so I used the energy law to calculate v when sliding down.

v=sqroot(2gh)

I used this to find vx=vcos(a)=sqroot(2gh)cos(a)

am I on the right track?
Careful. The potential energy of the box (mgh) is used to provide the total KE of box and slope.
 
  • #10
I don't think I got that.

What velocity do I find when I use this method? velocity of box relative to the slope?

if so how do I find the velocity I need?

I'm so stuck =P
 
  • #11
ippo90 said:
I don't think I got that.

What velocity do I find when I use this method? velocity of box relative to the slope?

if so how do I find the velocity I need?

I'm so stuck =P
One way is to express the speed of the box relative to the slope as V. Then you write your conservation equations in terms of that. In the final analysis, all you care about is the speed of the slope.

In your conservation of energy equation, set the initial PE equal to the total KE of both box and slope.

I just cranked it out and I get quite a messy expression. (It wouldn't surprise me if I made an algebra error along the way. I'm multi-tasking. :rolleyes:)
 
  • #12
the answer is supposed to be

v2'2=2m2ghcos2(a)/[(M+m)(M+msin2(a))]

did you get this?

my attempt:
mgh=1/2mv2+1/2(M+m)v2'2

where v is the velocity for the box when it gotten down (not in the x direction)

velocity in the x direction is:
v=v1'/cos(a)

I plugged it into the eq. above and got a ugly eq. but it doesn't seem to be the same as the correct answer.
 
  • #13
ippo90 said:
the answer is supposed to be

v2'2=2m2ghcos2(a)/[(M+m)(M+msin2(a))]

did you get this?
Yes, exactly.

my attempt:
mgh=1/2mv2+1/2(M+m)v2'2

where v is the velocity for the box when it gotten down (not in the x direction)
Is v the velocity of the box with respect to the slope or with respect to the ground?

You should have one term for m and another for M. You shouldn't have a term for (m+M).

velocity in the x direction is:
v=v1'/cos(a)
If v is with respect to the slope you must also add in the speed of the slope when calculating the horizontal speed of the box with respect to the ground.

My recommendation:
Use V to represent the speed of the box with respect to the slope.
Let the speed of the slope be v2' moving to the left.

Write the x-component of the speed of the box with respect to the ground.
Write the y-component of the speed of the box with respect to the ground.

Use the above speeds to write your conservation equations, for energy and horizontal momentum.
 
  • #14
to be honest, I'm totally lost now. why shouldn't I use (M+m)? the box is still on the slope.
I don't know how to use the velocity relative to the slope ='(
 
  • #15
ippo90 said:
why shouldn't I use (M+m)?
That would work if the box and slope were moving together as one. But they are not. You have two masses, m and M, and they each have their own speed.
the box is still on the slope.
True, but the box moves with respect to the slope.

I don't know how to use the velocity relative to the slope
If you were riding along with the slope, you'd see the box move down the slope with some speed V. That's what it means.

What we need are the speeds with respect to the ground, so combine the speed of the slope with the speed of the box with respect to the slope to get an expression for the speed of the box with respect to the ground.
 
  • #16
ok I now understand that v(box)=v(rel)+v(slope).

if I now write the law for conservation of momentum, it will be:

(m+M)v(slope)=m(v(rel)+v(slope))/cos(a)
 
  • #17
ippo90 said:
ok I now understand that v(box)=v(rel)+v(slope).
OK. Realizing that v(slope) is horizontal, find the x component of v(box). What's the x component of v(rel)?
if I now write the law for conservation of momentum, it will be:

(m+M)v(slope)=m(v(rel)+v(slope))/cos(a)
Again you combine m and M for some reason. All you need is this:
mv(box)x + Mv(slope) = 0

Suggestion: If you call the speed (magnitude) of the slope v2, then v(slope) = -v2 (since the slope moves to the left). Let V = v(rel). Then you can express all needed speeds in terms of v2 and V.
 
  • #18
even for the momentum you don't have to include both masses?

is it correct that v(box) and v(rel) have the same direction?
hence
v(box)x=v(box)cos(a)
and
v(rel)x=v(rel)cos(a)
??
 
  • #19
ok.. I've totally lost it.

what do I need to know to begin with?
 
  • #20
ippo90 said:
even for the momentum you don't have to include both masses?
Why would you? You have two separate masses, each with its own speed.

is it correct that v(box) and v(rel) have the same direction?
No. v(rel) is parallel to the slope direction. So you can use trig functions and the angle to find its components.

Here you go:
v(box)x = v(rel)cos(a) + v(slope) = Vcos(a) - v2
v(box)y = -v(rel)sin(a) = -Vsin(a)

So rewrite your conservation equations in terms of these.
 
  • #21
I somehow can't visualize the directions of v(box) and v(rel).

I tried to use the eq. from you post and got

Mv2=mvbx

and

mgh=1/2mvbx2+1/2Mv22

this should be correct
 
  • #22
ippo90 said:
I tried to use the eq. from you post and got

Mv2=mvbx
OK. But express it in terms of V and v2.

and

mgh=1/2mvbx2+1/2Mv22
Don't forget that the box has a y-component of velocity. And express it in terms of V and v2.
 
  • #23
I really want to understand this, but it's really hard to visualize. This is a stupid request but is it OK if you upload a pic where you draw in the vector for v(rel) and v for the box? MS paint is good for me =)
 
  • #24
ippo90 said:
I really want to understand this, but it's really hard to visualize. This is a stupid request but is it OK if you upload a pic where you draw in the vector for v(rel) and v for the box? MS paint is good for me =)
How about I try to describe it in words? We can worry about a diagram later.

At the time in question, when the box is at the bottom of the slope, let's describe the velocities:

A: The velocity of the slope with respect to the ground is horizontal and to the left. Let's call that v2, going to the left. (Imagine an arrow pointing left, with magnitude v2.)

B: The velocity of the box with respect to the slope is parallel to the slope. Call this vector v(rel) or V: imagine an arrow pointing down and to the right at an angle alpha below horizontal. This is just what you'd see if you were a bug riding along on the slope, watching the box slide; it's sliding down the slope, so of course its velocity is parallel to the surface of the slope. You can easily find the x and y components of this velocity since you know its direction.

C: The velocity of the box with respect to the ground, which we call v(box). To find this, we just add the first two velocities. Since we're adding a horizontal vector to the one slanting down at angle alpha, we end up with a vector that slants down and to the right at an angle greater than alpha with the horizontal. We can easily find the x and y components of this velocity by adding the components of the other velocities: Cx = Ax + Bx, etc.

This is similar to dropping a ball in a moving car. With respect to the car, the ball moves straight down. But with respect to the ground, the ball has an additional velocity due to the motion of the car itself.

I wouldn't get too concerned with visualizing all the details. What matters is that we can deal with things analytically.

The key is to realize that all our equations for energy and momentum conservation must use the speeds with respect to the ground. And we know how to find those and their components.

Let me know if this makes sense.
 
  • #25
That was a wonderful explanation, now everything makes sense!

earlier I thought that v(box) was pointing the same direction as the slope, and v(rel) was pointing with ''the angle + a little more''.

now I will try and see if I arrive at the correct answer=)
 
  • #26
Now I know that MV=mv(bx) where v(bx) is the velocity of the box from the ground.

v(b) can be expressed like this:
v(bx)=v(rel)cos(a)+V
and
v(by)=-v(rel)sin(a)

we also know that:
mgh=1/2mv(bx)2+1/2mv(by)2+1/2MV2

but the algebra is so hard.

But the analysis is correct?
 
  • #27
ippo90 said:
Now I know that MV=mv(bx) where v(bx) is the velocity of the box from the ground.
Good.

v(b) can be expressed like this:
v(bx)=v(rel)cos(a)+V
Looks like you're using V to represent the speed of the slope. (What we used to call v2; no problem.) Since it moves to the left, I would write this as:
v(bx)=v(rel)cos(a) - V
and
v(by)=-v(rel)sin(a)
Good.

we also know that:
mgh=1/2mv(bx)2+1/2mv(by)2+1/2MV2
Good.

but the algebra is so hard.

But the analysis is correct?
So far, so good. The next step is to replace all instances of v(bx) and v(by) with their equivalents in terms of V and v(rel). Then your momentum and energy equations will be ready to go.

Then you just need the stamina to grind it out. Sure it's a pain in the butt. But whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger! :-p

Hints: First expand the energy equation. Then use the momentum equation to solve for v(rel) and substitute what you find in the expanded energy equation. Don't give up now.

[Sorry for the delayed response. I've been tied up with real work. :wink:]
 
  • #28
Yay! I did it, thanks to you! =)

Thank you for having such patience with me. You're awesome ^^
 
  • #29
That's what I like to hear. Good work! :approve:
 
Back
Top