What is the relationship between constant speed rolling motion and friction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between constant speed rolling motion and friction, particularly in the context of dynamics of rigid bodies. Participants explore the implications of forces acting on a rolling wheel and the role of friction in maintaining constant velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents equations of motion for a wheel rolling on a surface and questions the implications of constant velocity when a force is applied.
  • Another participant challenges the existence of a force P while maintaining constant velocity, seeking clarification on the source of this force.
  • Some participants propose that rolling friction may be present, while others argue that in an ideal case with a perfectly rigid wheel, no friction is necessary to maintain constant velocity.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which static friction is relevant, with some asserting that static friction is zero if the wheel is not accelerating.
  • A participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the nature of friction in rolling motion, equating it incorrectly with kinetic friction in sliding scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of friction in constant speed rolling motion, with no consensus reached on whether friction is necessary or how it interacts with the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions about the nature of the wheel and surface interaction, including the idealization of a perfectly rigid wheel and the implications of rolling versus sliding friction. The discussion remains open regarding the specific conditions under which these assumptions hold.

flasherffff
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
hi ,this is my first post (and its not HW)
i currently study dynamics of rigid bodies
using (Hibbeler)

and there's one thing about this type of motion (rolling) that just seems to elude me

for any planar motion we have 3 equations
\Sigma F_{{x}}={\it ma}_{{g_{{x}}}}
\Sigma F_{{y}}={\it ma}_{{g_{{y}}}}
\Sigma M_{{g}}=i_{{g}}\alpha

if i have a wheel rolling on a surface with constant velocity ,say a car wheel not connected to the engine

by kinematics a_{{g}}=\alpha\,r then \alpha=0

then there is a force P acting on the mass center G
then by the first equation if ag=0
then the friction force f must be equel and opposite of p and acting at the contact point A

but then by eq3 the moment about G causes an increase in \alpha
contradicting the kinematics equation

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/4869/scanpic0001m.jpg

now ,obviously i got something wrong but what
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand. You say constant velocity, yet you have some force P acting? Where does that come from?
 
i assume there is some rolling friction beforehand
 
If there is a force acting on the center of the wheel, one or both of the two statements is true.

1) The car is accelerating/decelerating.
2) The car is applying torque to the wheel via brakes/engine.
 
but if i don't apply a force
the rolling motion would stop due to friction
 
flasherffff said:
but if i don't apply a force
the rolling motion would stop due to friction
What friction? Are you considering rolling friction? First get the ideal case straight--perfectly rigid wheel with no friction to worry about.
 
why a perfectly rigid wheel would experience no friction
i mean static friction at the point of contact
 
Last edited:
flasherffff said:
why a perfectly rigid wheel would experience no friction
i mean static friction
Unless the wheel/surface deform--the source of dissipative rolling friction which stops real wheels from rolling indefinitely--there's no friction to worry about. No static friction is required to maintain the motion--it's constant velocity. The static friction is zero if the wheel isn't accelerating.
 
thanks ,i understand what i got wrong
i assumed there is a constant friction resisting to rolling just like the kinetic friction for sliding
 
  • #10
You start with alpha=0 which means no acceleration, which is true only if there is no friction or if there is a torque applied to counter friction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K