Constantly accelerating object and its proper time

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the proper time experienced by a rocket undergoing constant acceleration from rest to 0.8c over a duration of 4 seconds in a laboratory frame. Participants explore various methods to approach the problem, including integration and the use of relativistic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using integration to find the proper time but expresses uncertainty about how to start.
  • Another participant references DrGreg's posts as helpful for understanding the rocket's world line.
  • A participant calculates the velocity in the laboratory frame and attempts to derive the proper time through integration, but finds the result inconsistent with expectations.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in evaluating an integral due to using degrees instead of radians.
  • Several participants propose using a standard relativistic rocket equation as a simpler alternative to integration, noting that the problem involves constant coordinate acceleration rather than constant proper acceleration.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the problem being framed as one of constant coordinate acceleration, with some participants questioning whether this framing is appropriate or typical for introductory problems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the acceleration involved (coordinate vs. proper) and whether the problem is appropriately framed for learners. There is no consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, and some participants highlight the complexity of finding proper time under different acceleration conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks specificity regarding whether it refers to proper or coordinate acceleration, which may affect the approach to solving it. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the integration process discussed.

lhy56839
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is:

A rocket has a constant acceleration in a rest frame that is 0 to 0.8c in 4s. What is its proper time?

This question I found, I guess I'll have to use integration but don't have a clue where to start off. Could you give me some ideas please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DrGreg's posts in this thread can help you figure out what the rocket's world line looks like.
 
Thanks for the post. By the way, I'm still struggling to find the answer for this question.

What I've done is first find the velocity of the particle in the laboratory frame,

[tex]a=\frac{c}{5}[/tex] so [tex]v=\frac{ct'}{5}[/tex]

Where [tex]t'[/tex] is the time measured in the laboratory frame.

As [tex]dt'/dt=\gamma[/tex], [tex]dt/dt'=\frac{1}{\gamma}[/tex]

Now, integrating both sides wrt t' gives,

[tex]t=\int\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}dt'[/tex]

with a bit of simplifying, it becomes

[tex]t=\frac{1}{5}\int\sqrt{5^2-t'^2}dt'[/tex]

Computing this integral with boundary t'=0...4 gives a value too large for t as t must be less than 4s.

Please give me advice about things I've done wrong
 
You don't have to thank me when I give you bad advice. :smile: I misread your post and thought you meant constant proper acceleration.

What you have posted looks right, so maybe you just did something wrong when you evaluated the integral. (I haven't done that part). I think a better way to simplify the integral is to make a change of variables t''=t'/5. Then maybe a trigonometric substitution...or just look it up in an integral table.
 
Lol.. I found what I did wrong.. I calculated the integral in degrees mode (not radians)!
 
lhy56839 said:
The question is:

A rocket has a constant acceleration in a rest frame that is 0 to 0.8c in 4s. What is its proper time?

This question I found, I guess I'll have to use integration but don't have a clue where to start off. Could you give me some ideas please?
There is no reason to make this so complicated. You can just use a standard relativistic rocket equation (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html )

t' = (c/a)invsinh(at/c) = 3.665 sec.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Al68 said:
There is no reason to make this so complicated. You can just use a standard relativistic rocket equation (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html )

t' = (c/a)invsinh(at/c) = 3.665 sec.
You're making the same mistake as I did. This problem is about constant coordinate acceleration, not constant proper acceleration. If the problem had specified constant proper acceleration, it would have been much harder.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fredrik said:
Al68 said:
There is no reason to make this so complicated. You can just use a standard relativistic rocket equation (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...SR/rocket.html )

t' = (c/a)invsinh(at/c) = 3.665 sec.
You're making the same mistake as I did. This problem is about constant coordinate acceleration, not constant proper acceleration. If the problem had specified constant proper acceleration, it would have been much harder.
Are you sure it's about constant coordinate acceleration wrt the initial rest frame? That seems odd.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is it odd? It's just an exercise for people who have just started to learn this stuff. It would be much more difficult for them to find the proper time if the problem had specified constant proper acceleration. I mean, of course it's easy if you use a physics FAQ to find out what the world line looks like, but it's hard to do it using only the information given in the problem and the definition of proper time.
 
  • #10
Fredrik said:
Why is it odd? It's just an exercise for people who have just started to learn this stuff. It would be much more difficult for them to find the proper time if the problem had specified constant proper acceleration. I mean, of course it's easy if you use a physics FAQ to find out what the world line looks like, but it's hard to do it using only the information given in the problem and the definition of proper time.
Yeah, I think I missed the obvious: it looks like a homework problem. But if so, it should be more specific about whether it's proper or coordinate acceleration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K