Constraints on a hoop rolling on a cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the constraints governing the motion of a hoop rolling on a cylinder, specifically the relationship defined by the equation $$(r+R)\theta = r\phi$$. This equation indicates that the distance traveled by the center of mass of the rolling hoop is equal to the distance traced by a point on its circumference during rotation. The confusion arises from the alternative constraint $$R\theta = r\phi$$, which does not accurately represent the no-slip condition. The key takeaway is understanding how the angles $\theta$ and $\phi$ relate during the hoop's motion around the cylinder.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational motion and angular displacement
  • Familiarity with the concepts of no-slip conditions in rolling objects
  • Basic knowledge of geometry related to circles and cylinders
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations involving angular relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rolling motion and no-slip conditions in physics
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of constraints in rolling systems
  • Learn about the dynamics of rigid body motion in relation to angular momentum
  • Investigate real-world applications of rolling motion in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rolling objects and constraints in motion.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
A uniform hoop of mass m and radius r rolls without slipping on a fixed cylinder of radius
R. The only external force is that of gravity. If the smaller cylinder starts rolling from
rest on top of the bigger cylinder, use the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the
point at which the hoop falls off the cylinder.
Relevant Equations
.
My question is about the contraint we need to use to solve this problem. The answer to the question use the following constraint:

$$(r+R)\theta = r\phi$$

Where $\theta$ is angle from the radius of the fixed cylinder to, say, the vertical axis. And $\phi$ is the angle that the rolling cylinder has rotated.

My question is, why the contraint is not $$R\theta = r\phi$$ ?

That is, the distance traveled by the point of the rolling cylinder in contact with the fixed cylinder, $R \theta$, equals the length traced by a point on its circunference when it has rotated $\phi$, that is, $r \phi$.

Seems to me that the contraint imposed by the answer says that the ditance traveled by the center of mass of the rolling cylinder is equal to the length it traces while rotate $\phi$, but i can't see why. Shouldn't the condition of "no slipping" be reference to the poins on its circunference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your difficulty is seeing how ##\phi## changes for a given change in ##\theta##.
It may help to imagine a complete ‘orbit’ of the hoop around the cylinder (without the hoop falling off).

In this case ##\theta = 2\pi## and the hoop’s centre moves a distance ##d = 2 \pi (R+r)##.

If the hoop rolled the same distance ##d## on a flat surface, the hoop (circumference = ##2\pi r##) would perform ##n## rotations were ##n = \frac {2 \pi (R+r)} {2\pi r} = \frac {R+r}{r}##.

In this situation ##\phi = 2\pi n = 2\pi \frac {R+r}{r}##

Look at the ratio ##\theta : \phi##

Editted - minor changes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K