Constructing Chiral Superfield from Vector Superfields

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neitrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chiral
Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi,


Is it possible to construct chiral superfield from Vectorsuperfields and/or combinations of vector superfield and some another chiral superfield...


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can look for massive vector superfields, which actually are the combination of a massless vector superfield and a massless chiral superfield. And in some sense a N=1 massive is as a N=2 massless.
 
Neitrino said:
Hi,


Is it possible to construct chiral superfield from Vectorsuperfields and/or combinations of vector superfield and some another chiral superfield...


Thanks

Sure this is possible, the most important example is the spinor superfield W_alpha out of which the kinetic term is constructed.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top