Constructing Proofs: Solving Set Functions with Characteristic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpatialVacancy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving properties of characteristic functions for subsets A and B of a set S. Specifically, it addresses two equations: the characteristic function of the intersection of A and B, and the characteristic function of their union. Participants suggest using a truth table to demonstrate the equivalence of both sides of the equations by considering all possible cases for membership in A and B. The brute force method of computing both sides for different scenarios is recommended as a straightforward approach. The goal is to clarify the mathematical properties of characteristic functions in set theory.
SpatialVacancy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Constructing Proofs help!

Here is the problem:

Given a set S and subset A, the characteristic function of A, denoted \chi_A, is the function defined from S to \mathbb{Z} with the property that for all u \ \epsilon \ S:


<br /> \chi_A(u)=<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> 1 &amp; \text{if u $ \epsilon \ A$} \\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{if u $ is not \ \epsilon \ A$}<br /> \end{cases}<br />

Show that each of the following holds for all subsets A and B of S and all u \ \epsilon \ S.

a. \chi_{A \cap B}(u)= \chi_A (u) \cdot \chi_B (u)
b. \chi_{A \cup B}(u)= \chi_A (u) + \chi_B (u) - \chi_A (u) \cdot \chi_B (u)



I have NO IDEA what this problem is asking...can someone please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The brute straightforward way is:
Compute both sides of the equations for all cases:
(I) u is in A and B
(II) u is in A or B, but not both.
(III) u is not in A and not in B.
 
.
You might present the proof in "Truth Table" format and show equivalence via Table equality. For example:
Code:
.
.-----------------------> [B]Χ(A ∩ B)[/B]

                           Member
                             B
                      YES         NO

             YES       [B]1          0[/B]
     Member   
       A
             NO        [B]0          0[/B]




.----------------------> [B]Χ(A)*Χ(B)[/B]

                           Member
                             B
                      YES         NO

             YES    (1)*(1)    (1)*(0)
     Member            [B]1          0 [/B]
       A
             NO     (0)*(1)    (0)*(0)
                       [B]0          0[/B]
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top