Contemporary applications of Classical Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
Recent applications of classical mechanics include its role in understanding dark matter, particularly through the study of galaxy rotation speeds and mass discrepancies. The discussion highlights that early detections of dark matter were based on these observations, which remain significant in current research. The participant seeks insights into whether this method is still the primary approach for calculating dark matter in the universe. Additionally, turbulence is mentioned as another area of interest for exploration. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the ongoing relevance of classical mechanics in modern astrophysical studies.
nkunka
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

First time posting. I was thinking of starting an extra credit paper for my Physics 1A course, and was wondering if anybody could think of any noteworthy and recent applications of classical mechanics that I could do some research on. I was thinking of maybe pursuing dark matter as a topic. I know that early "detections" of dark matter relied on observations of the rotational speed of galaxies and galaxy clusters to approximate the mass within, thus discovering the discrepancy between the observable matter in those galaxies and what it should be. Is this still the primary means by which the amount of dark matter in the universe is calculated? Any nudges in any direction are appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Turbulence.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top