Continuity of a complex function defined on the union of an open and closed set

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a complex function defined on the union of an open set and a closed set, specifically examining the implications of continuity on subsets of the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the continuity of the function based on the continuity of its restrictions to open sets. They express uncertainty about providing an example where continuity fails when one set is not open.
  • Some participants question the implications of using the complex logarithm, noting potential discontinuities and considering specific sets like the upper and lower half-planes.
  • Another participant suggests exploring the scenario where the sets are disjoint and the function is constant on each set.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem and raising questions about the continuity of functions defined on various subsets. Hints have been provided to guide the exploration of examples and theoretical implications.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions feeling unprepared for the problem-solving nature of the exam, indicating a potential gap between theoretical understanding and practical application.

ridethespiral
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(i) Let U and V be open subsets of C with a function f defined on U \cup V suppose that both restrictions, f_u \mathrm{and} f_v are continuous. Show that f is continuous.

(ii) Illustrate by a specific example that this may not hold if one of the sets U, V is not open.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Now I'm pretty sure I can prove the first part. As, since f is continuous on U and V then there exists a \delta_1 and on U there will be a \delta_2 and then taking the minimum of these will put |f(z) - f(w)| < \epsilon for all epsilon. This works because U and V are open, as it ensures that for each w, there will be a delta disc such that z is in either U or V.

I'm pretty stumped as to an example for the second part. I think I get why it may not hold if U or V is not open, as there will not always be a delta disc around a point in a closed set which is completely contained in that set. But I can't think of a way to use this to arrive at an example.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: complex logarithm
 
Hmm, I'm not really sure how to use the logarithm. Is it because if you take the principal logarithm, there will be a discontinuity in the principal argument going from -π to π? So if you take the logarithm defined on \mathbb{C} \backslash {(-\pi, \pi]} then the set isn't open. Or perhaps, take U to be the upper half plane and V to be the lower, and the principal argument will be discontinuous? I'm not sure if this is making sense.

I'm confusing myself now. Our lecturer taught this module from a theoretical point of view but decides to make the exam this type of problem solving, which he hasn't really prepared us for. Thanks for any help.
 
Hint: Consider what can happen if U and V are disjoint and f is constant on U and constant on V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K