Continuity of a Function with Two Variables (x,y): Homework Help and Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathoholic!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a function with two variables, specifically examining the function defined as f(x,y)=\frac{x^3}{x^2+y^2} for (x,y)≠(0,0) and f(x,y)=0 for (x,y)=(0,0).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of composition of functions to analyze continuity, with one suggesting the use of polar coordinates to simplify the limit evaluation as (x,y) approaches (0,0). Questions arise about the sufficiency of examining limits along specific paths versus all possible paths.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods to establish continuity, with some participants suggesting rewriting the function in polar coordinates. A participant confirms that their approach leads to a limit of zero as r approaches zero, while another emphasizes the need to consider limits from various paths to fully establish continuity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of proving continuity at a point in a multivariable context, with discussions highlighting the limitations of path-dependent analysis and the necessity of comprehensive limit evaluation.

Mathoholic!
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To study the continuity of a function with two variables (x,y).

Homework Equations



f(x,y)=[itex]\frac{x^3}{x^2+y^2}[/itex] if (x,y)[itex]\neq[/itex](0,0)
f(x,y)=0 if (x,y)=(0,0)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried going by the composition of functions but I can't seem to get anywhere...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I prove that the function is continuous by using the composition of functions like so(?):

g(t)=(t,t)
fog(t)=[itex]\frac{t}{2}[/itex] with t[itex]\neq[/itex]0
fog(t)=0 with t=0

Given that g(t) is continuous and fog(t) is continuous because when t→0, fog(t)=0.
 
That is not sufficient. You are, in effect, looking at the limit as you approach the origin along the line y= x. But in order to say that the function is continuous at the origin, you would have to show that you get the same limit as you approach the origin along any curve. While you can use that to show that a function is NOT continuous at the origin, by finding two different ways of aproaching the origin that give different limits, you cannot use it to show a function is continuous. You simply can't "try" every possible path.

For this function, I recommend you rewrite it in polar coordinates. That way, the distance to the given point, the origin, depends upon the single variable, r. If you can show that the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend upon the variabe [itex]\theta[/itex], then the function is continuous at the origin.
 
HallsofIvy said:
For this function, I recommend you rewrite it in polar coordinates. That way, the distance to the given point, the origin, depends upon the single variable, r. If you can show that the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend upon the variabe [itex]\theta[/itex], then the function is continuous at the origin.

When I rewrote the expression in polar coordinates it gave the following:

f(r,θ)=rcos3(θ)

When (x,y)→(0,0) , r→0, with r=(x2+y2)1/2

Then f(r,θ)→0 when r→0.

Am I doing this right?
 
Mathoholic! said:
When I rewrote the expression in polar coordinates it gave the following:

f(r,θ)=rcos3(θ)

When (x,y)→(0,0) , r→0, with r=(x2+y2)1/2

Then f(r,θ)→0 when r→0.

Am I doing this right?
Yes that's right because cosine is bounded: |cosθ| ≤ 1 .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K