Continuity of a Function with Two Variables (x,y): Homework Help and Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathoholic!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the continuity of the function f(x,y) defined as x^3/(x^2+y^2) for (x,y) ≠ (0,0) and 0 at (0,0). The approach using composition of functions is deemed insufficient for proving continuity at the origin, as it only examines limits along specific paths. Instead, rewriting the function in polar coordinates is recommended, where the limit as r approaches 0 should not depend on the angle θ. The transformation yields f(r,θ) = r cos^3(θ), and as r approaches 0, the function approaches 0, indicating continuity. The conclusion affirms that the method is correct since the cosine function is bounded.
Mathoholic!
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To study the continuity of a function with two variables (x,y).

Homework Equations



f(x,y)=\frac{x^3}{x^2+y^2} if (x,y)\neq(0,0)
f(x,y)=0 if (x,y)=(0,0)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried going by the composition of functions but I can't seem to get anywhere...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I prove that the function is continuous by using the composition of functions like so(?):

g(t)=(t,t)
fog(t)=\frac{t}{2} with t\neq0
fog(t)=0 with t=0

Given that g(t) is continuous and fog(t) is continuous because when t→0, fog(t)=0.
 
That is not sufficient. You are, in effect, looking at the limit as you approach the origin along the line y= x. But in order to say that the function is continuous at the origin, you would have to show that you get the same limit as you approach the origin along any curve. While you can use that to show that a function is NOT continuous at the origin, by finding two different ways of aproaching the origin that give different limits, you cannot use it to show a function is continuous. You simply can't "try" every possible path.

For this function, I recommend you rewrite it in polar coordinates. That way, the distance to the given point, the origin, depends upon the single variable, r. If you can show that the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend upon the variabe \theta, then the function is continuous at the origin.
 
HallsofIvy said:
For this function, I recommend you rewrite it in polar coordinates. That way, the distance to the given point, the origin, depends upon the single variable, r. If you can show that the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend upon the variabe \theta, then the function is continuous at the origin.

When I rewrote the expression in polar coordinates it gave the following:

f(r,θ)=rcos3(θ)

When (x,y)→(0,0) , r→0, with r=(x2+y2)1/2

Then f(r,θ)→0 when r→0.

Am I doing this right?
 
Mathoholic! said:
When I rewrote the expression in polar coordinates it gave the following:

f(r,θ)=rcos3(θ)

When (x,y)→(0,0) , r→0, with r=(x2+y2)1/2

Then f(r,θ)→0 when r→0.

Am I doing this right?
Yes that's right because cosine is bounded: |cosθ| ≤ 1 .
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top