Continuity of partial derivatives in a ball implies differentiability

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the differentiability of a function \( f: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} \) at a point \( (a,b) \) given that the partial derivative with respect to \( x \) is continuous in an open ball around \( (a,b) \) and the partial derivative with respect to \( y \) exists at that point. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach the situation where only one partial derivative is continuous.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks guidance on how to handle the case of differentiability with only one continuous partial derivative. Some participants suggest using the definition of differentiability and exploring the implications of the continuity of the partial derivative with respect to \( x \).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the problem, with some providing hints related to the definition of differentiability. The original poster acknowledges the hints and expresses appreciation for the assistance, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of initial progress on the problem, indicating that they have not formulated a clear approach before seeking help.

Mathmos6
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm looking at the following problem:
Suppose that f:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R} is such that \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}} is continuous in some open ball around (a,b) and \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}} exists at (a,b): show f is differentiable at (a,b).

Now I know that if both partial derivatives are continuous in a ball around (a,b) it is differentiable, but I don't know how to deal with the case where we only have continuity of one partial derivative and existence of the other - could anyone help me with this?

I've thought about it for a good hour or so now and don't seem to be getting anywhere (I know I'm meant to post what I've got so far but I literally have nothing!) so the more help you can give me the better!

Many thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the definition of differentiable.

A function of two variables, x and y, is "differentiable" at (a, b) if and only if there exist a function \epsilon(x,y) such that f(a+ x, b+ y)= f(a, b)+ x (\partial f/\partial x(a,b))+ y(\partial f/\partial y(a,b))+ \epsilon(x,y) and
\lim_{(x,y)\to (a,b)}\frac{\epsilon(x,y)}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^2}}= 0

Since both \partial f/\partial x(a,b) and \partial f/\partial y(a,b) exist, we can define \epsilon(x,y) as f(a+ x, b+ y)- f(a, b)+ x (\partial f/\partial x(a,b))+ y(\partial f/\partial y(a,b)).

Try to use the fact that \partial f/\partial x is continuous to show that goes to 0 as (x,y) goes to (0, 0).
 
HallsofIvy said:
Use the definition of differentiable.

A function of two variables, x and y, is "differentiable" at (a, b) if and only if there exist a function \epsilon(x,y) such that f(a+ x, b+ y)= f(a, b)+ x (\partial f/\partial x(a,b))+ y(\partial f/\partial y(a,b))+ \epsilon(x,y) and
\lim_{(x,y)\to (a,b)}\frac{\epsilon(x,y)}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^2}}= 0

Since both \partial f/\partial x(a,b) and \partial f/\partial y(a,b) exist, we can define \epsilon(x,y) as f(a+ x, b+ y)- f(a, b)+ x (\partial f/\partial x(a,b))+ y(\partial f/\partial y(a,b)).

Try to use the fact that \partial f/\partial x is continuous to show that goes to 0 as (x,y) goes to (0, 0).

Got it, thanks very much! :)
 
I'm impressed! Even with my hint, that was not a simple problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K