Continuum Mechanics: Stress on Opposite Sides of Infinitesimal Cube

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the stress distribution on opposite sides of an infinitesimal cube in continuum mechanics, particularly in accelerating systems like fluids. It highlights the importance of Cauchy's lemma, which relates to Newton's third law, ensuring that stresses are balanced. The presence of body forces is acknowledged, which influences the momentum balance equations and can address discontinuities. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification provided by the referenced textbook. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the fundamental principles of stress analysis in continuum mechanics.
vmtgomes
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask about Continuum Mechanics or if the right place would be the engineering forums, but since Continuum Mechanics is a branch of Classical Mechanics, I thought it might be the place.

My question is about Stress. Why does the stresses on opposite sides of an infinitesimal cube have to be the same? I know about the equilibrium. But what if the continuum is accelerating (for example if it is part of a fluid)? How can you describe the stresses on a point? If usually we use a stress tensor with nine components with respect to three orthogonal interfaces at a point, now this wouldn't be possible since we would have eighteen different stresses at that point.

I can't find any continuum mechanics forums on the internet. If you know of anyone, please tell me and sorry for the amount of questions.

Thanks,
Vítor Mussa T. Gomes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are asking about Cauchy's lemma:

http://www3.esc.auckland.ac.nz/people/staff/pkel015/SolidMechanicsBooks/Part_III/Chapter_3_Stress_Mass_Momentum/Stress_Balance_Principles_03_The_Cauchy_Stress_Tensor.pdf

Which is equivalent to Newton's third law (action-reaction).

If there is a body force present, that is accounted for in the momentum balance equation- which can also account for surfaces of discontinuity.

Does that help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, that certainly helps! I read this part of this textbook you linked here and it helped a lot.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top