Contour integration exp(ikx)/x

  • Thread starter Thread starter aranud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the principal value integral of exp(ikx)/x from -infinity to infinity, utilizing contour integration techniques. The original poster seeks to apply a formula from their textbook and explore the displacement of the pole method to further analyze the integral of sin(x)/x over the same limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses using Jordan's lemma to show that the contour integral in the upper half-plane approaches zero, allowing the application of a specific formula. They express confusion regarding the displacement of the pole technique and question the implications of having no poles in the integration domain.
  • Some participants inquire about the impact of the sign of k on the contour closing method, suggesting that the approach may vary based on this parameter.
  • Others note that while the original poster assumed k to be positive, the sign of the integral may indeed affect the outcome, prompting further exploration of the problem for both positive and negative k values.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of contour integration and the implications of varying k. Some guidance has been offered regarding the contour closure based on the sign of k, and there is a recognition of the need to understand the integral's behavior under different conditions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a potential misunderstanding related to the displacement of the pole and the behavior of the integrand as ε approaches zero. There is also a note that the problem statement does not specify the sign of k, which has led to assumptions that may need reevaluation.

aranud
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the principal value integral exp(ikx)/x from -infinity to infinity first with a formula derived in the textbook and then by displacing the pole. Use this result to calculate the integral of sin(x)/x from -infinity to infinity.


Homework Equations


If the integral around the contour in the upper half of the plane goes to zero when the radius goes to infinity one can use the following formula:
integral f(x)/(x-x0) = i*pi/f(x0)+2pi*(residus poles) The poles in the domain around which you integrate.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've managed to prove with jordan's lemma that the upper part of the contour goes to zero when integrated so the formula can be used. Since the only pole is on the contour at x=0 we get that the integral is i*pi*1. This isn't so weird because the integrand isn't real either.

My problem is with the displacement of the pole technique. If we displace the pole north by changing the integrand to exp(ikx)/(x+iε) the integrand is split in an imaginary and real part:
limε→0 RE[int(sin(kx)/(x+iε)] + i limε→0 RE[int(icos(kx)/(x+iε))]

But because there are no poles in the domain around which I integrate these should both be zero? I think I'm missing something very basic here but Ican't figure out what it is.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you close the contour should depend on the sign of k. Did you take that into account?
 
Well the problem statement just said k was real number so I tacitly assumed it to be positive and closed the contour in the half plane. The integral shouldn't depend on which half-plane you use to close the contour anyway.
edit: apparently the sign of the integral does depend on k. But if I manage to solve it for k positive I'll understand the k negative problem too.
 
aranud said:
Well the problem statement just said k was real number so I tacitly assumed it to be positive and closed the contour in the half plane. The integral shouldn't depend on which half-plane you use to close the contour anyway.
edit: apparently the sign of the integral does depend on k. But if I manage to solve it for k positive I'll understand the k negative problem too.

For the first calculation, you can just change your variables so that the exponential eikx is replaced with ei|k|x, and you get your result easily. But what happens if you try doing after you have displaced the pole?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K