Contrapositive proof of irrational relations

FelixHelix
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I'm confused with a question and wondered if anyone could help explain where I need to go...

let x ε R. Prove that x is irrational thenI'm confused with a question and wondered if anyone could help explain where I need to go...

let x ε R. Prove that x is irrational then ((5*x^(1/3))-2)/7) is irrational.

I've learned that this is a proof by contrapositive so set ((5*x^(1/3))-2)/7) to be rational and hence a/b with a,b ε Z and b ≠ 0, and there for x is rational.

But I'm not sure where to go from here. Do I rearrange to find for x? x = ((7a - 10b)/5b)^3

But this is still raational isn't it? Where is the contradiction?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Call that big expression y, and solve for x. If y is rational, what does that tell you about x?
 
I thought I did solve for x. If y is rational then x is rational but where is the contradiction? I don't see
 
Ah, I missed that step in your initial post.

Remember that contradiction is different from contraposition. For contraposition, you're actually already done.

Contraposition takes advantage of the fact that a->b is equivalent to (not b) -> (not a).

You showed that y is rational implies that x is rational. Therefore, you've shown that x is irrational implies y is irrational.
 
FelixHelix said:
I'm confused with a question and wondered if anyone could help explain where I need to go...

let x ε R. Prove that x is irrational thenI'm confused with a question and wondered if anyone could help explain where I need to go...

let x ε R. Prove that x is irrational then ((5*x^(1/3))-2)/7) is irrational.

I've learned that this is a proof by contrapositive so set ((5*x^(1/3))-2)/7) to be rational and hence a/b with a,b ε Z and b ≠ 0, and there for x is rational.

But I'm not sure where to go from here. Do I rearrange to find for x? x = ((7a - 10b)/5b)^3

But this is still raational isn't it? Where is the contradiction?

Thanks

the rational numbers are closed under multiplication,division, and addition.
 
FelixHelix said:
I'm confused with a question and wondered if anyone could help explain where I need to go...

let x ε R. Prove that x is irrational thenI'm confused with a question and wondered if anyone could help explain where I need to go...

let x ε R. Prove that x is irrational then ((5*x^(1/3))-2)/7) is irrational.

I've learned that this is a proof by contrapositive so set ((5*x^(1/3))-2)/7) to be rational and hence a/b with a,b ε Z and b ≠ 0, and there for x is rational.

But I'm not sure where to go from here. Do I rearrange to find for x? x = ((7a - 10b)/5b)^3

But this is still raational isn't it? Where is the contradiction?

Thanks

by assumption a, and b are INTEGERS, with b non-zero.

well if a and b are integers, then surely k = 7a - 10b is also an integer.

thus k3 and 125b3 are also integers, and moreover, 125b3 ≠ 0.

thus x = k3/(125b3) is rational.

but x was assumed irrational, contradiction.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top