Contribution to physics- who should be included?

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on preparing a concise speech about the evolution of physics, highlighting key contributors from Archimedes to modern times. The speaker lists notable physicists and their contributions, including Archimedes on buoyancy, Kepler on planetary motion, Newton on motion and gravitation, Faraday on electrolysis, Planck on radiation, Heisenberg on uncertainty, Maxwell on electromagnetism, Einstein on relativity, Feynman and Dirac on quantum physics, and Hawking on black hole radiation. Suggestions arise to include Galileo and Aristotle while considering the removal of some names for brevity, particularly Hawking. The conversation also touches on the paradoxes of physics, illustrating how increased knowledge can lead to greater uncertainty about the universe. Overall, the focus remains on refining the list of physicists to fit the time constraints of the speech.
charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
Hi all I have to do a quick 5 minute speech just about the evolution of physics...

My general idea is just to go back say from Archimedes~ to currently who has been the main contributors to physics?

Obviously it's only a 5 minute speech so not everyone can get a mention but I would like to name the physicist and give a brief description of what they have achieved.

So far...

Archimedes~buoyancy
Kepler~ planetary laws of motion
Newton~Motion,Gravitation,Cooling
Faraday~Faraday's Laws of Induction and Electrolysis
Planck~Law of radiation
Heisenberg~uncertainty
Maxwell~Electromagnetism
Einstein~Special and General relativity
Feynman&Dirac~quantum phys
Hawking~black hole radiation.

Is there anyone I have missed or even I can take of the list as I really don't have enough time to cover all these physicist's work.

The one's I am thinking of taking of please tell me if I shouldn't...
Archimedes, Planck, Faraday or Maxwell or is it possible to combine them?Hawking?

Please some feedback!

:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would mention Aristotle and Galileo. They are often used to describe the evolution of physics (and science in general) and for a good reason.
 
Yes you should add Galileo, and you can leave out Hawking. I would not know one that we are sure to be famous two centuries from now.
 
harrylin said:
Yes you should add Galileo, and you can leave out Hawking. I would not know one that we are sure to be famous two centuries from now.

Good point!

Definitely Galileo, completely forgot about him. Thanks...

anyone else I could take out??
 
The history of physics.

Newton: Even though you can tell if you are speeding up, you can't tell how fast you are going.
Maxwell: Yes you can.
Einstein: No you can't. You can't even tell if you are speeding up.
Heisenberg: Either you don't know where you are or you don't know where you're going.

Physics in a nutshell: The more you know about physics, the less you know about the world you live in.
 
Jimmy Snyder said:
The history of physics.

Newton: Even though you can tell if you are speeding up, you can't tell how fast you are going.
Maxwell: Yes you can.
Einstein: No you can't. You can't even tell if you are speeding up.
Heisenberg: Either you don't know where you are or you don't know where you're going.

Physics in a nutshell: The more you know about physics, the less you know about the world you live in.

This is a gem!

:smile::smile:
 
Jimmy Snyder said:
The history of physics.

Newton: Even though you can tell if you are speeding up, you can't tell how fast you are going.
Maxwell: Yes you can.
Einstein: No you can't. You can't even tell if you are speeding up.
Heisenberg: Either you don't know where you are or you don't know where you're going.

Physics in a nutshell: The more you know about physics, the less you know about the world you live in.

Hahaha this pretty much sums it up!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top