Control Theory (EE): How to set up a transmittance given wn only?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around setting up a second-order plant transmittance given specific pole positions related to the undamped natural frequency (ωn). Participants explore the implications of having one pole at ωn = 0 rad/sec and another at ωn = 2 rad/sec, addressing the challenges in defining the plant transmittance and its transfer function.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to set up the plant transmittance given the two different ωn values, noting that a second-order system typically has a characteristic polynomial that suggests a single ωn.
  • Another participant questions the wording of the problem statement, suggesting that 'plant transmittance' may not be distinct from 'plant transfer function' and emphasizes the need for clarity in the problem's phrasing.
  • Some participants agree that the poles must be purely real due to the presence of ωn = 0, leading to the conclusion that the system is likely overdamped with poles at the origin and -2.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of undamped natural frequency as a means to locate poles along the real line, which some participants find acceptable.
  • A later reply indicates that the initial confusion has been resolved, and the plant transfer function has been established correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of the pole positions and the nature of the system, but there is some disagreement regarding the terminology used in the problem statement and the implications of having different ωn values.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the problem statement, particularly regarding the definitions of 'plant transmittance' and 'plant transfer function', as well as the implications of the specified pole positions.

CDTOE
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do we set up a second-order plant transmittance with the only information available are:

One pole is at a position where the undamped natural frequency (ωn = 0 rad/sec), and the other pole is at a position where ωn = 2 rad/sec?

The question asks to build that transmittance, draw pole-zero plot, find the transfer function and break it down into natural and forced components, which are required to be plotted, given a step input. I only had trouble setting up the plant transmittance which is, unfortunately, the base of the whole solution.

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



To set up the plant transmittance, I couldn't quite understand how I should do it. A second-order system will have a characteristic polynomial of the form (S2+2ωnζs+ωn2), where ζ is the damping ratio. Given this polynomial, I couldn't see how we can have two different ωn values. If one of the poles would have ωn, then the system should be underamped or undamped depending on the value of ζ. ωn = 0 would mean that the said pole is on the real axis given that there is no an oscillatory part.

Given all of that, I decided that I set up a transmittance based on mild guessing, so it was:

GP(s) = \frac{1}{s(s+2)}

A pole at the origin and another at -2. I couldn't do anything other than doing something that at least shows that I can draw a pole-zero plot and do all what's asked.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you've given the problem statement here exactly like it was worded to you? Often people tend to post their own interpretation of the problem, which is what gives them difficulty in solving it in the first place.

For one thing, I have to admit, I've never heard of 'plant transmittance' as something which isn't synonymous with 'plant transfer function'. Your problem statement seems to indicate that determining it is something separate from determining the plant transfer function.

Isolines of natural frequency are circular arcs in the LHP with radius equal to the natural frequency, and since complex poles only come in conjugate pairs for a LTI system with real coefficients, your poles must be purely real. They must also then be located at s = 0 and s = -2, so I can't really see anything wrong with your plant transfer function. The wording of your assignment, as given, just generally seems a bit off, but that's just my opinion.
 
I don't remember how the problem was worded exactly, but I'm sure that the only information that were given to set up the plant (transfer function) was that there's a pole with ωn=0 rad/sec and another pole with ωn= 2 rad/sec. As for the system transfer function, it wasn't mentioned whether the system is open or closed loop, so I believe that it would be the same as the plant transfer function given that there would be no feedback (open loop system).

As for pole positions, yes, there shouldn't be a pair of complex conjugate poles given that there's a pole with ωn=0. Given all of this, I believe, like you said, that we should be having an overdamped system with two poles one at the origin and another one at -2.

7986-5-1P-i37.png


How about that?
 
So since you now have the plant transfer function, all is well?

With regards to the bit about having two different values of undamped natural frequency - for real poles you can just interpret the undamped natural frequency as a way to locate them along the real line, which is what you've done.
 
Yes, everything is good now. Thanks for help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
94
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K