Controlling Microorganisms: Methods Inside and Outside the Body"

  • Thread starter Thread starter DEWANA
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Microorganisms can be controlled both inside and outside the body through various methods. Inside the body, the innate and acquired immune systems play crucial roles, with the acquired immune system utilizing T-cells and antibodies to combat pathogens. Outside the body, physical barriers like skin and cilia in the respiratory tract serve as non-specific defenses against infections. For comprehensive information, microbiology textbooks and educational podcasts, such as those available on iTunes, are recommended resources. Understanding these methods is essential for effective microorganism control.
DEWANA
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Microorganisms please help!

Hello guys...I hope You can help me Again! I just want to say first THANK YOU OF ALL OF YOU! YOu have help me very much !


I must answer this simple question but I can not find it anywhere...

The question is:

"List the ways in which Mircoorganisms can be controlled both outside and inside the body"

If someone knows where I can find this please let me know...

If its a book pleae tell me the book name or the Internet site

Thank U very much

Maria
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll try and give you some key words to look up: Inside the body we have an innate (non-specific) and acquired immune system. The acquired immune system is divided into the cell mediated and humeral (not sure on the spelling). The humeral (sp?) immune system is also called the antibody mediated immune system. Only the acquired immune system uses T-Cells. I'm pretty sure both types involve macrophages and other phagocytes that eat other cells.

The skin itself is a barrier to infection, as well as cilia in the upper respiratory tract which push out any foreign material including pathogens. Both of these would be characterized as non-specific defenses of the body.

You should get a microbiology textbook all the information you need will be in the first few pages of a chapter introducing the immune system. Fishing around on the internet will take much longer.
 
There are also podcasts from Biology courses that you can download for free from Itunes. Itunes is also free.

If you get it (or already use it), go to the "Itunes music store" in the left-hand column.

Wait, it may take a few minutes to upload,

Then in the search box (upper right-hand corner) type in "BIO 205". it may take a few minutes to search.

Then Itunes will bring up a a list of songs and audio and video files, but Above that there will be a section for Podcasts click "see all" and you should find one titled "BIO 205" click it, and you should then be able to download whichever lectures you want from the BIO 205 course (Microbiology) (the "itunesU" section is also helpful for finding lectures, btw).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top