Convergence: The Integral Test

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series \(\sum \frac{1}{2n(2n+1)}\), with participants exploring various convergence tests and methods to analyze the series. The subject area includes series convergence, integral tests, and comparison tests.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the integral test and express uncertainty about the assumptions made during the integration process. Some explore the comparison test with known convergent series, while others question the validity of their reasoning and the implications of their findings.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on convergence tests and sharing insights on the implications of their assumptions. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches, with some participants expressing confidence in their conclusions while others seek clarification on their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as homework guidelines and the need to apply specific convergence tests as outlined by their professor. There is also a recognition of the challenges posed by the series and the varying levels of understanding among participants.

Joshk80k
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is

[tex]\sum \frac{1}{2n(2n+1)}[/tex]

convergent or divergent?

(Note that the summation is from 1 to infinity)


Homework Equations



[tex]\int f(x) dx = L[/tex], (range is from 1 to infinity)

IF
L = [tex]\infty[/tex], divergent
L < [tex]\infty[/tex], convergent.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried a number of tests, and this is the only convergence test that I am not sure about. I attempted the ratio and root tests, but both were inconclusive.

As for my attempt,

[tex]\int \frac{1}{2n(2n+1)}dx[/tex], using the partial fractions method to integrate,

[tex]\int \frac{1}{2n(2n+1)}dx = \int \frac{A}{2n} + \frac{B}{2n+1}[/tex]

[tex]1 = 2nA + 2nB + A[/tex]

Matching up coefficients,

[tex]A^0: 1 = A[/tex]

and

[tex]A^1: 0 = 2A + 2B,[/tex]

[tex]B = -A = -1[/tex]

[tex]\int \frac{1}{2n(2n+1)}dx = \int \frac{1}{2n} + \frac{-1}{2n+1}[/tex]

Using substitution,

[tex]\int \frac{1}{2n} = \frac{1}{2}ln(2n)[/tex]

and

[tex]\int \frac{-1}{2n+1} = -\frac{1}{2}ln(2n+1)[/tex]

So, adding these two together, and using properties of the natural log,

[tex]\frac{1}{2}ln(2n) + -\frac{1}{2}ln(2n+1) = \frac{1}{2}ln(\frac{2n}{2n+1})[/tex]

Now, inserting the bounds 1 and t (Where t is infinity),

[tex]\frac{1}{2}ln(\frac{2t}{2t+1}) - \frac{1}{2}ln(\frac{2}{3})[/tex]

Here is where I am a little stumped. I want to say "Hey, t is infinity, and at large values of t, we can ignore the excess numbers (In this case, 2t + 1 is just a tiny bit different than 2t, so we ignore the 1 to make the cancellation) and as a result, I'll have a finite value, and for this reason, the answer is convergent.

BUT, I have always been a little shaky on convergence tests - am I doing this correctly or am I wrong to make that assumption about the cancellation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An easier test for this one is comparison with the convergent series [itex]\sum 1/(4n^2)[/itex].
 
Sigh.

Using your method, I got the answer in 15 seconds, as opposed to the 15 minutes my other way took.

Thanks to you, I know this is now convergent - but, for future reference, is it OK for me to make that assumption that I made towards the end of the problem?
 
Yes. Adding or subtracting a constant won't affect the decision of convergence/divergence. If the integral diverges (to infinity), adding or subtracting a little bit doesn't change that. Same thing if the integral converges. Subtracting or adding something just gives a different (finite) number.
 
Ah OK, thanks so much for your help! My professor gave us a whole list of these things to figure out, and if I'm applying the comparison test you just showed me correctly, then I shouldn't have any more problems.

Am I applying what you just showed me in the correct manner here?

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n(n+1)}}[/tex]

to [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n(n)}} = \frac{1}{n}[/tex].
 
Joshk80k said:
Ah OK, thanks so much for your help! My professor gave us a whole list of these things to figure out, and if I'm applying the comparison test you just showed me correctly, then I shouldn't have any more problems.

Am I applying what you just showed me in the correct manner here?

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n(n+1)}}[/tex]

to [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n(n)}} = \frac{1}{n}[/tex].

You've got 1/(sqrt(n*(n+1))<=1/sqrt(n*n)=1/n. You know 1/n is divergent, right? If so that's not good enough. You shown your original series is less than a divergent series. That doesn't prove anything. If you want to prove it diverges you need to show it's GREATER than a divergent series. Any ideas?
 
I want to relate it to something like
[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n(n+2)}}[/tex]

But to be honest I can't think of an easy way to deal with that one either...I'll continue thinking about it...thanks for correcting it though =).
 
How about comparing 1/sqrt(n*(n+1)) with 1/sqrt(n*(n+n))? Which is greater and what can you say about the convergence of the second without working too hard?
 
Last edited:
I can say that my original function is greater than this new function, and that this new function is also divergent.

OK, I can see how your choice coincides with the way the convergence test is written. I just made the mistake of jumping the gun with this new technique =).
 
  • #10
Joshk80k said:
I can say that my original function is greater than this new function, and that this new function is also divergent.

OK, I can see how your choice coincides with the way the convergence test is written. I just made the mistake of jumping the gun with this new technique =).

I think you are getting it. You can always make convenient choices in the comparison to make them easier to evaluate.
 
  • #11
Joshk80k said:
Sigh.

Using your method, I got the answer in 15 seconds, as opposed to the 15 minutes my other way took.

Thanks to you, I know this is now convergent - but, for future reference, is it OK for me to make that assumption that I made towards the end of the problem?

Your attempt is not a complete loss. Actually, there is something interesting to gain: the notion of telescoping series.

[tex]\frac{1}{2n(2n+1)} = \frac{1}{2n}-\frac{1}{2n+1}[/tex]

Within your sum, replace [itex]\frac{1}{2n(2n+1)}[/itex] with [itex]\frac{1}{2n}-\frac{1}{2n+1}[/itex]. Then write out a few terms, and observe any simplifications via grouping...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K