Conversion of Piezoelectric coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conversion of piezoelectric coefficients from double index notation to triple index notation for simulation purposes. The original poster seeks assistance in ensuring that the values are correctly placed in the new format used by software like Abaqus and MSC Marc. A participant provides insights on the index pairs and the mathematical relationships involved in the conversion process, highlighting the complexity of the task. The original poster expresses gratitude for the feedback and plans to revisit relevant resources for further understanding. Accurate conversion is crucial for effective simulation of the converse piezoelectric effect in materials.
John Kai
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone,

I am interested on simulating the converse Piezoelectric effect of materials and I have given the mechanical (Youngs modulus and Poissoin's ratio) and electric material properties (Electric Permittivity, Piezoelectric coupling matrix etc). However from the literature I got double index notation, I am struggling to convert double index notation to triple index notation.

The double index notation from literature is as follows:

Double index notation

d11 d12 d13 d14 d15 d16 -------------- 0 0 0 0 21.3 0

d21 d22 d23 d24 d25 d26 -------------- 0 0 0 21.3 0 0

d31 d32 d33 d34 d35 d36 -------------- -2.6 -2.69 3.65 0 0 0

Triple index notation:
I would like to convert them to Triple index notation used by some commercial software providers like Abaqus and MSC Marc etc and is written as follows:

d11_1 d11_2 d11_3 -------------- 0 0 -2.6

d22_1 d22_2 d22_3 -------------- 0 0 -2.6

d33_1 d33_2 d33_3 -------------- 0 0 3.65

d12_1 d12_2 d12_3 -------------- 0 21.3 0

d23_1 d23_2 d23_3 -------------- 21.3 0 0

d31_1 d31_2 d31_3 -------------- 0 0 0

Am I doing the conversion correctly? Are the values placed in correct positions?
Double Index = Triple Index = Coupling Matrix Value
d11 = d11_1 =0
d21 = d11_2 = 0
d31 = d11_3 = -2.6
d12 = d22_1 = 0
d22 = d22_2 = 0
d32 = d22_3 = -2.6
.
...
...

d16 = d31_1 = 0
d26 = d31_2 = 0
d36 = d31_3 = 0

I am new to this filed and its kind of a big deal for me to understand all these conversions. Your feedback will be highly appreciated.
Kai
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think the index pairs are

##(1,1) = 1##
##(2,2) = 2##
##(3,3) = 3##
##(2,3) = (3,2) = 4##
##(1,3) = 5##
##(1,2) = (2,1) = 6##

There are factors of two thrown in so that

##C_{nmjk}S_{jk} = C_{ab}S_b##

things like

## S_{1,2} = \frac{1}{2} S_3##

when the dust clears. ##n, m, j, k## summed over 1 - 3 and ##a, b## summed 1-6.
This may help.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity
 
Dear Paul Colby,

I thnak you very much for your quick reply and explanation. I have already read the Wikipedia page briefly and will go through it again.
Thanks again!
 
  • Like
Likes Paul Colby
This Piezo Systems site has some great images that may interest you.

e.g.
tech2intropiezotrans13.gif
 

Attachments

  • tech2intropiezotrans13.gif
    tech2intropiezotrans13.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 557
  • Like
Likes John Kai
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top