Convert Extreme sound into usable energy

AI Thread Summary
Converting extreme freeway noise into usable energy is not feasible due to the low power output of sound energy. While sound can be converted into electrical current, the efficiency required to generate significant power is unrealistic, with estimates suggesting only microwatts could be produced. The health impacts of living near such noise levels are concerning, and it's recommended to explore noise barriers as a potential solution. Overall, the discussion highlights the impracticality of harnessing sound energy in this context. Addressing the health effects of freeway noise should be prioritized.
Silentkitty2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Our backyard backs up to a major freeway u need hear protection to stand at the back gate for to long we r less then 20 feet from the edge of the road id like to turn this extreme noise into usable energy... is there anyway to convert it into electricity or use some kind of aperatise to convert it into heat and then power some kind of a generator to make the electricity or something in those works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ah.. no... sorry but just give up on that
 
Sound power is small... you can convert sound into an electrical current, that's what microphones do. But in order to have 1 W of power from an engine 20 feet away you'd need a microphone several square meters big, and with 100% efficiency (totally unrealistic). I know something about the price of normal microphones and I don't think it's a good idea... :D
 
I'm guessing results on the order of microwatts. Do you consider that usable?
 
Silentkitty2, Welcome to Physics Forums!  :)

The above responses are correct: you would not be able to generate any significant electrical power from that noise.

That noise is not good for you and your family. You could search using Google for “health-related effects of freeway noise”. For a good overview of the subject and what can be done, see:

"Highway traffic noise barriers"

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/noise_barriers/design_construction/keepdown.cfm
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top