Converted the 110W (j/s) into kWh

  • Thread starter Thread starter TyErd
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around converting the power consumption of fluorescent tubes from watts to kilowatt-hours (kWh) and calculating the total energy cost for a campus. Each fluorescent tube uses 0.11 kWh per hour, leading to a total power usage of 3,041,280 kWh and a cost of approximately $249,384.96 for the year, based on 240 days of operation. When accounting for a 4-hour daily unoccupied period, the usage drops to 253,400 kWh, resulting in a reduced cost of $207,820.80, yielding a savings of $41,564.16. The calculations are confirmed to be correct, considering the large number of fluorescent tubes in use. The analysis emphasizes the importance of accurate unit conversions and cost estimations in energy consumption assessments.
TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have attached the question.


Homework Equations


-


The Attempt at a Solution


Well i first converted the 110W (j/s) into kWh which is 0.11kWh. so each tube used 0.11kWh an hour. now because there is 12 in each classroom and 6in each faculty room and 200 class rooms and 400 faculty rooms. That means there are 2400 tubes classroom tubes and 2400 faculty room tubes. that means for the 240 days it is a total power usage of: (0.11 x 2400 x 24 x 240) x 2 = 3041280 kWh. the cost then is 3041280 x 0.082 = $249384.96

When the lights are turned off during the unoccupied 4hours the total power usage then becomes: (0.11 x 2400 x 20 x 240) x 2 = 253400kWh, so the cost is 253400 x 0.082 = 207820.80. which means the campus will save $41564.16

Is this correct? the only thing that worries me is the numbers. $249384.96 is really high but then again it is an awful lot of fluorescent tubes.
 

Attachments

  • aaaaaaaaa.png
    aaaaaaaaa.png
    49 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org


looks right to me
 


are the numbers correct?
 


1. Given:

1 classroom : 12 fluorescent
1 fluorescent : 110 Watts
1 office : 6 fluorescent
1 year : 240 days
$0.082 : 1 kWh
1 unoccupied period : 4h per day
$ ? [cost] : 1 year

2. Let's use the quantity of units for analysis.
The objective here is to match the units on the right side to the
required unit on the left side. We start with the unit $. In the given,
we have a ratio between $ and KWh so we wrote them down on the first
term of the right side of the equation. We do the process until the
uncancelled term is $/yr. We attach the values for each unit afterwards.

$/yr = $/kwh * W/flourescent * flourescent*(classroom+offices)
* days/yr * h/day

C = 0.082/1000 * 110 * (12*(200+400)) * 240 * 4 = answer
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top