Converting Cylindrical Coordinates to Rectangular: A Helpful Hint

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting the equation r=2cos(θ) from cylindrical coordinates to rectangular coordinates, which involves understanding the relationship between these coordinate systems. Participants are exploring the implications of this conversion and the associated geometric interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for converting the given equation, including attempts to express x and y in terms of θ and the use of trigonometric relationships. Questions about the range of θ and its impact on the resulting plot are also raised.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and suggestions for visualizing the problem through diagrams and right triangles. Some express uncertainty about the clarity of their contributions, while others reflect on the nature of the problem and its interpretation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the lack of a specified range for θ, which may affect the interpretation of the function. Additionally, participants note the distinction between polar and cylindrical coordinates, particularly regarding the z-dimension.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Convert r=2cos(theta) from cylindrical coordinates to rectangular coordinates




I have tried squaring both sides so that it will be equal to x squared plus y squared, and then solving for a variable. No matter what I do though I am left with two variables so I feel like I am taking the wrong approach. Where do I even start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe this is polar coordinates. I think you would benefit from drawing a picture of this on top of a rectangular plane. You can draw a right triangle with an acute angle theta at the origin, one leg on the x-axis, and a hypotenuse of r. You should be able to find x and y in terms of theta. From there, you can find y in terms of x.
 
Are you given a range of theta? If it is 0 to 2PI, the y=f(x) plot is not single-valued for x.

Interesting plot, BTW. Have you sketched the function?
 
I was not given a range, and no I have not tried to sketch it yet.
 
Last edited:
How do I convert that to rectangular coordinates though? I mean I have tried plugging r into x=rcos(theta), and all the other various equations I could think of, and always ended up with multiple variables. The cos in there really throws me off.
 
Last edited:
x=rcos(@), y=rsin(@) , z=z, (@=theta)

r=2cos(@)=> r/2=cos(@)=> r/2=x/r, and we know in general that : r^2=x^2+y^2

Now try to combine these expressions, and see what you get...
 
Last edited:
You can try the method that I tried to explain earlier. Here is the diagram I was talking about to further illustrate.

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/1748b19e37.jpg

You make a right triangle. I am drawing it at an arbitrary theta, the math should hold up for all theta though. As you can see, one side of the hypotenuse is at the origin and the other end is at the arbitrary point (r, theta) which is part of the polar function r = 2cos(theta). You should also notice that the two legs of the triangle are the horizontal and vertical distance from the origin or (x, y). You can use trig to solve for x and y in terms of theta. Start with that.
 
I guess i just ruined the party!
 
I'm sorry sutupidmath, I'm working with algebra II math, so I'm not completely sure what you did, but you got the same answer as me. I started writing my previous thread before you posted your response, I didn't mean to contradict you or anything.
 
  • #10
Chaos2009 said:
I'm sorry sutupidmath, I'm working with algebra II math, so I'm not completely sure what you did, but you got the same answer as me. I started writing my previous thread before you posted your response, I didn't mean to contradict you or anything.

No, no, don't worry. It's just that i shouldn't have given the whole answer to the OP. I'm debating whether i should delete it or not!...lol...
 
  • #11
Chaos2009 said:
I believe this is polar coordinates.

The difference between polar and cylindrical coordinates, is that in cylindirical coordinates we have the third dimension,(z), but this doesn't cause us any trouble since z=z(i.e it has the same value in cylindrical and rectangular coordinates) SO as a result it will change how we interpret our result.

From here, i suspect, you would be inclined to interpret the final result as a circle with radius 1 and center (1,0), wouldn't you?
 
  • #12
sutupidmath said:
No, no, don't worry. It's just that i shouldn't have given the whole answer to the OP. I'm debating whether i should delete it or not!...lol...

Yeah, too much help, IMO. I'm too tired to delete it though -- can you still edit it into more of a hint?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K