Converting Geometrized Units: The Role of G and c in Christoffel Symbols

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I am looking at some Christoffel symbols that are expressed using geometrized units, and the only variables to appear are m,r and theta. If I want to convert these to non-geometrized units, how do I know where to place the G's and c's?

Is there a consistent way of doing this sort of thing? Do I simply change the m's to mG/(c^2)'s and the t's to ct's? I understand that if I know in advance the dimensionalities that I am looking for then it is not a problem, but that is not always the case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know of any way to do that correctly in all cases. I usually just take exactly the approach you mentioned, and it often works.
 
You can see from the geodesic equation that the Christoffel symbols have dimension L-1, if that helps. It also follows from the definition of the CS's. To get back to non-geometrical units you should multiply terms containing g00 by c2, and terms like g0k by c ( k = 1,2,3, time is x0). You have the correct substitution for m.
 
Thank you both.

Now I have a quick follow-up: If the Christoffel symbols have dimension L-1 (which is what I thought) then what about the case of

\Gamma ^{r} _{\theta \theta} = -r

in plane polar coordinates? That doesn't look like L-1. There is an analogous counterexample in spherical coordinates, too.
 
Yes, it is only L-1 for the Cartesian coords. However, you can easily work out the dimensions by looking at the definition, and the metric. For the Schwarzschild metric

\Gamma ^{r} _{\theta \theta} = 2m - r which clearly has dimension L, which it must in order that

\frac{d^2r}{d\lambda^2} has the same dimensions as

\Gamma ^{r} _{\theta \theta}\left(\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda}\right)^2

Sorry for my hasty first post, it looks like you can read off the dimensions of the connections from the geodesic equation.
 
It looks like the dimensions of \Gamma ^{a}_{bc} always = \frac {(dimensions\ of\ a)}{(dimensions\ of\ b)(dimensions\ of\ c)}<br />.

Well that's easy to remember. Thanks again, Mentz.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top