Converting Helium back to Hydrogen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Mak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium Hydrogen
AI Thread Summary
Helium cannot be converted back into hydrogen due to the energy requirements involved in the process. While nucleosynthesis in stars can create helium from hydrogen, reversing this process would require significant energy input, as helium atoms are more stable than hydrogen. The binding energy curve indicates that lighter elements release energy during fusion but require energy for fission. Conversely, heavier elements release energy through fission and need energy for fusion. Understanding these principles clarifies why transforming helium back into hydrogen is not feasible.
The Mak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the reason why a helium atom cannot be turned back into a hydrogen atom.

We know in a star that through nucleosynthesis helium is formed from hydrogen and the process continues to form heavier elements. Is there a similar, but in reverse process where lighter elements are formed from heavier elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. It's called fission. :smile:

But it takes a lot of energy to separate helium into hydrogen.
 
Thanks for the quick reply.
 
You need to study the binding energy curve.

Basically atoms lighter than iron release energy in fusion and take in energy for fission

whilst

Basically atoms heavier than iron release energy in fission and take in energy for fusion

Here is a more complete answer

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/bindingE.html

also look up the packing fraction curve.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top