Converting Watts, Distributed Over An Area, To Energy Density

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of power measured in watts, distributed over an area, into energy density without involving time. Participants explore the definitions and relationships between power, energy density, and the relevant physical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jake questions how to derive energy density from watts without involving time, indicating a desire for a direct relationship.
  • One participant points out that energy density can refer to energy per unit volume or mass, and emphasizes the need for a velocity to relate time to distance.
  • Another participant suggests that to find energy density, one must multiply power by a time interval and divide by the area or volume.
  • Jake later states that since watts travel at the speed of light, this could help in finding an answer, seeking clarification on how to apply this to energy density.
  • A participant provides a formula for energy density in terms of power, area, and the speed of light, asserting it gives the desired units of J/m³.
  • Jake acknowledges the formula but expresses confusion over the use of area versus volume in the context of the equation provided.
  • Another participant clarifies that power flux should be considered through a surface section rather than volume, drawing an analogy to electrical current to explain the relationships between the quantities involved.
  • Jake expresses gratitude for the information received, indicating that the provided formula may suffice for his needs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions and relationships involved in converting watts to energy density. There are competing views on how to properly relate power, area, and energy density, with some confusion regarding the use of area versus volume.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of energy density and the assumptions about the context in which power is being applied. The relationship between power and energy density remains unresolved due to differing interpretations.

jaketodd
Gold Member
Messages
507
Reaction score
21
Is there a way to get energy density from watts, with the resultant energy density not involving time, as watts do?

Thanks,

Jake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not supplied enough information.

First of all energy density is not well defined in your question. Depending on the context it could mean energy per unit volume or energy per unit mass. You stated that you are starting with power per unit area so (J/t)/m2 or J/tm2. Assuming that by energy density you mean energy per unit volume the units are J/m3 so in order to equate the 2 you need to be able to equate time to meters. In other words, you need the velocity of the energy.
 
jaketodd said:
Is there a way to get energy density from watts, with the resultant energy density not involving time, as watts do?

Thanks,

Jake

Watt is a unit of power, and is equal to a joule per second. If you have a power and want to know an energy density, you need to multiply the power by some interval of time and divide by the area or volume to which the power is distributed.
 
Thanks guys...

The watts travel at the speed of light. Also, the volume is m[itex]^{3}[/itex]. Does this help get an answer?

Thanks,

Jake
 
I'm looking for a conversion of watts, given that they travel at the speed of light, over a predefined area, which I could, perhaps, multiply by. In other words, I'm trying to get the energy density.

Thanks,

Jake
 
So you have either RF radiation or some other massless boson field flux through a given area. Easy.

[tex]\rho_E = \frac{P}{A c}[/tex]

Edit: Note that it gives you J/m³, which is what you want, if I'm not mistaken.
 
K^2 said:
So you have either RF radiation or some other massless boson field flux through a given area. Easy.

[tex]\rho_E = \frac{P}{A c}[/tex]

Edit: Note that it gives you J/m³, which is what you want, if I'm not mistaken.

Excellent. However, I think I shot myself in the foot by saying "area." I meant volume. I assume the 'A' in your equation is for two-dimensional area, and not volume? And, yes, [itex]\stackrel{J}{m^{3}}[/itex] is what I want.

EDIT: Actually I think what you gave me might work for my purposes, but it would be nice to have answered this latest query.

Thanks!

Jake
 
Last edited:
Power flux through volume doesn't make sense. Power flux through a give surface section does. That's what you need to know to find the average energy density of whatever's flowing past.

Think about it in terms of analogous situation with electrical current. The quantities correspond as follows.

[tex]P \rightarrow I[/tex]
[tex]A \rightarrow A[/tex]
[tex]\rho_E \rightarrow \rho_q[/tex]
[tex]c \rightarrow v[/tex]

Where v is drift velocity, and I is total current flowing through cross section. Then you know that current is given by this expression.

[tex]I = \rho_q A v[/tex]

Rearrange the terms, and you get the same thing.
 
Like I said in the edit, I think what you have provided will suffice for me, and I thank you greatly!

Jake
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K