Convolution of gaussian functions

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
ElijahRockers
Gold Member
Messages
260
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Recall that we have defined the Gaussian ##f_s## by ##f_s (t) = \sqrt{s}e^{-st^2}## and shown that ##\hat{f_s}(\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{\frac{-\lambda^2}{4s}}##.

Show that ##f_3 \ast f_6 (t) = \sqrt{\pi}f_{1/2}(t) = \sqrt{\pi/2}e^{-t^{2}/2}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure what's wrong with my approach, but I'm getting ##i## in both of my attempts answers, and besides that my answers are no where near close to the correct answer. Each of the pages represents a single attempt. I first tried multiplying the Fourier transforms of both functions then taking the inverse, and when that didn't work, I tried using the definition of convolution.

Image is attached but resized is hard to read... full size is here
 

Attachments

  • 20150324_221826.jpg
    20150324_221826.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 562
Physics news on Phys.org
ElijahRockers said:

Homework Statement


Recall that we have defined the Gaussian ##f_s## by ##f_s (t) = \sqrt{s}e^{-st^2}## and shown that ##\hat{f_s}(\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{\frac{-\lambda^2}{4s}}##.

Show that ##f_3 \ast f_6 (t) = \sqrt{\pi}f_{1/2}(t) = \sqrt{\pi/2}e^{-t^{2}/2}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure what's wrong with my approach, but I'm getting ##i## in both of my attempts answers, and besides that my answers are no where near close to the correct answer. Each of the pages represents a single attempt. I first tried multiplying the Fourier transforms of both functions then taking the inverse, and when that didn't work, I tried using the definition of convolution.

Image is attached but resized is hard to read... full size is here
On the left hand page, you're fine down to here:
Capture_ERockers_1.PNG

The line you have after is in error.
It would have been better pull out only ##\displaystyle\ e^{-2t^2} \,,\,## leaving an integrand of ##\displaystyle\ e^{\displaystyle-(9\tau^2-12\tau\,t+4t^2)} \ ## .

The exponent is the negative of a perfect square. Use a substitution to solve the integral.

On the right hand page, you have the following:
Capture_ERockers_2.PNG

Therefore, simply multiply ##\displaystyle\ \hat{f_3}(\lambda) \hat{f_6}(\lambda) \ ## . Then simply transform back using:
##\hat{f_s}(\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{\frac{-\lambda^2}{4s}}##​
in reverse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ElijahRockers
Hmmm... transforming back using the inverse Gaussian formula should be rather straightforward, but I don't see where the pi comes from in the final answer.

EDIT: Also the teacher has made a correction to the problem, the answer should be ##f_3 \ast f_6 = \sqrt{\pi} f_2 (t) = \sqrt{\pi/2}e^{-2t^2}## which still doesn't make sense, but I'm inclined to believe he meant ##\sqrt{\pi} f_2 (t) = \sqrt{2\pi}e^{-2t^2}##
 
ElijahRockers said:
Hmmm... transforming back using the inverse Gaussian formula should be rather straightforward, but I don't see where the pi comes from in the final answer.

EDIT: Also the teacher has made a correction to the problem, the answer should be ##f_3 \ast f_6 = \sqrt{\pi} f_2 (t) = \sqrt{\pi/2}e^{-2t^2}## which still doesn't make sense, but I'm inclined to believe he meant ##\sqrt{\pi} f_2 (t) = \sqrt{2\pi}e^{-2t^2}##
I forgot, transforming back, there is a normalization factor to consider.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ElijahRockers