Cooling a gas by releasing it into vacuum: Entropy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the cooling effect observed when a gas under pressure is released into a vacuum through a small hole. This process results in a narrower distribution of particle speeds and a lower temperature, despite the energy remaining constant, as thermal energy converts to kinetic energy. The participants explore the implications for entropy, noting that while the gas appears to decrease in entropy during the release, the overall entropy must increase due to the expansion into a larger volume. The principles of the Bernoulli equation and the behavior of gases under pressure are also highlighted as key concepts in understanding this phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Bernoulli equation and conservation of energy
  • Familiarity with gas behavior and thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of entropy and equilibrium states in thermodynamic processes
  • Basic principles of kinetic theory of gases
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Bernoulli equation and its applications in fluid dynamics
  • Study the principles of thermodynamics, focusing on entropy and equilibrium states
  • Explore the kinetic theory of gases and its implications for particle behavior
  • Investigate the effects of gas expansion into a vacuum and its thermodynamic consequences
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and thermodynamics, particularly those interested in gas behavior, entropy, and energy conservation principles.

greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.

I just read an article where following cooling method is described. Apparently it's very common, but I don't know what it's called:

A gas under pressure is released into a vacuum through a small hole. The average particle speed in this beam of gas is the same as before, but the distribution is much narrower, and also all particles move in about the same direction. Although the energy didn't change, the temperature of the gas is much lower than before, because an observer flying next to the beam with the average particle speed would only see slowly moving particles.
In short, thermal energy has been converted into kinetic energy.

Now this seems a lot like the entropy of the gas decreased. The process looks irreversible though, so there surely must be a bigger entropy increase somewhere, but where? I suspect it's probably the increase in volume, but in the illustrations in the article the particle beam looks very narrow and the particles pretty localized.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about how you would calculate it, but do you think you could heat up the stream of particles, and they would shoot back into the tiny hole in the container? The answer to this should give you some insight to what is happening with the entropy.
The following video has a pretty interesting explanation of how entropy works.
 
greypilgrim said:
Hi.
I suspect it's probably the increase in volume, but in the illustrations in the article the particle beam looks very narrow and the particles pretty localized.

Then there is an error.

Small hole: Particles fly in all directions.

A nozzle: Particle beam expands more slowly than in the previous case.

A very large nozzle: Particle beam expand very slowly after leaving the nozzle. Particle beam's thickness near the nozzle is about the same as nozzle's diameter.
 
A beam of particles is not going to stay in a narrow beam unless something is forcing to stay in that beam - a pipe for example. Otherwise, when particles bang into each other, some will bounce in a different direction than the main beam, causing the group of particles to spread.
 
scottdave said:
A beam of particles is not going to stay in a narrow beam unless something is forcing to stay in that beam - a pipe for example. Otherwise, when particles bang into each other, some will bounce in a different direction than the main beam, causing the group of particles to spread.

Beams where particles collide behave the same way as beams where particles do not collide, because ... both beams are made of gas. Pressure of beam does not matter. Temperature matters.
 
greypilgrim said:
A gas under pressure is released into a vacuum through a small hole. The average particle speed in this beam of gas is the same as before, but the distribution is much narrower, and also all particles move in about the same direction. Although the energy didn't change, the temperature of the gas is much lower than before, because an observer flying next to the beam with the average particle speed would only see slowly moving particles.
In short, thermal energy has been converted into kinetic energy.
Your example illustrates the principle behind the Bernoulli equation which is about conservation of energy. The pressure in the gas that passes into the vacuum drops to 0 and freely expands into the vacuum. After leaving the hole the gas molecules travel in all directions except backward (i.e over a 180 degree range) so the centre of mass of the expelled gas moves away from the hole at an average speed given by Bernoulli's equation. It is not in an equilibrium state so its temperature is undefined. If and when it settles down into its new larger volume, however, it is ends up in an equilibrium state. And if it is an ideal gas it will end up at its original temperature.
Now this seems a lot like the entropy of the gas decreased. The process looks irreversible though, so there surely must be a bigger entropy increase somewhere, but where? I suspect it's probably the increase in volume, but in the illustrations in the article the particle beam looks very narrow and the particles pretty localized.
The change in entropy is defined only between equilibrium states. You have not defined your final equilibrium state. The entropy of the gas expanding indefinitely into a vacuum is undefined. If and when it settles down into an equilibrium state with a larger volume, it will have increased entropy.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GAURAV DADWAL

Similar threads

  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K