Cooling element optimizing -advanced help needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilkka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Element
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on optimizing the thickness of the base of a copper cooling element designed to dissipate a 100W heat load from a 1cm² surface area using liquid nitrogen (LN2). Key factors include the heat transfer efficiency of the copper surface and the impact of distance from the heat source on energy transfer to the LN2. The conversation also touches on the need to consider both the bottom and pipe sections of the cooling system for effective thermal management. Participants seek to determine the optimal base thickness while maintaining the lowest possible temperature for the heat source. The overall goal is to enhance cooling performance while ensuring a continuous supply of LN2.
Ilkka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Here is the situation: We have 100w heatload coming from little die which has only 1cm^2 of surface area. We cool it with Ln2 as cold as possible (in normal atmospheric pressure) by using simple round container which is made of 99.99% copper. Let's assume that system is perfectly isolated so all the energy for Ln2 boiling comes from the 100w 1cm^2 surface area.

Lets easen the situation by choosing cooling elements wall thickness 5mm so that we have to optimize only the bottom thickness. The inside bottom surface area is roughly 3,25*3,25*3,14=33cm^2 and the wall surface area inside 6,5*3,14*20-x (around 390cm^2).

There are many holes in the task.

First of all we should know the amount of wattage 1cm^2 of copper surface area can transfer to Ln2. This also depends on the distance from the heat source so the core surface area above the core moves energy much more efficiently to Ln2 than in upper parts of the pipe due the temperature difference.

Lets assume the cooling element has smooth shining inside surface (bad for boiling but it makes sense for this task since the bottom thickness will be this way something else than "thinnest possible" since the extra surface area from upper section of the cooling element is needed for most cold result).

I don't know what level of knoweledge this forum has but I am thinking this as an "breakfast challenge" for some physics teacher or professor.


I will give more information if there is anyone who has slightest idea how to calculate this (i know this goes 3-dimensional stuff when done right). Here is picture from the system:

http://koti.mbnet.fi/ilkkahy/sekalaiset/container.JPG"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The heat transfer of an annular pipe is:

q_r = \frac {2 \pi L k (T_{s,1} - T_{s,2} ) } {ln (\frac{r_2}{ r_2})}

k- conduction coefficient ~= 401 W/m-C
Ts,1 = Temperature at hot surface (C)
Ts,2 = Temperature at cold surface (C)
L = length of rod
r = radius
r2 = radius outter (M)
r1 = radius inner (M)
 
Last edited:
I think that would help us calculating the heatloss (heat coming trough the pipe from ambient to ln2) but isn't what I am looking for here (im pretty sure there isn't ready formula for this one).

I figured that this system might need to be divided in two parts: bottom and pipe. Then it might be easier to solve.
 
Hi Ilkka,
It's not obvious to me what you're trying to determine. Are you trying to determine the total amount of heat that is going into the LN2 or are you trying to calculate the temperature of the 100 W heat source? If you're trying to determine what thickness the bottom of the container should be, what criteria do you have for the temperature that's allowed for the 100 W heat source? Also, are we to assume the supply of LN2 is to be replenished? If not, are you trying to determine how long the LN2 will last?
 
Keyword: Newton's law of cooing.
 
We are trying to find out optimal thickness of the base (presented X in the picture) of this copper cooling element to get 100w heat source as cold as possible. The cooling element is kept full of Ln2 as it boils away.

The picture i put in my first post should help a bit.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top