Cooling things in water vs air

AI Thread Summary
Cooling a pressure cooker in water initially absorbs heat effectively, but as the water warms, its cooling efficiency decreases. Removing the cooker from the water may allow it to cool faster due to increased evaporation and exposure to cooler air. The cooling rate is influenced by factors such as air temperature, water temperature, and the surface area-to-volume ratio of the pot. If the cooker and sink reach thermal equilibrium, the cooling process will slow down significantly. Ultimately, while both methods have their merits, the specific conditions will determine which is more effective for cooling.
Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
Hi everyone

After I've cooked beans in a pressure cooker, I put the cooker (with beans inside) into a sink full of water to help it cool down. After a while, the water heats up. At this point, would the cooker cool faster if I left it in the sink or if I took it out again?

I'm guessing it would be the latter because the air would be cooler than the water (the water feels lukewarm after it's absorbed heat from the cooker).

Is this correct, or am I looking at things too simply?

I'm just interested in the theory behind it. I pretty much leave the cooker out all day to cool. Either way will probably make little difference. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If after the initial cooling in water, you remove the cooker from the water, it will then cool by evaporation until the surface dries. Each time you splash water on the cooker it will cool again.

Running a slow steady stream of cold water over the cooker, and then down the drain, will probably give the maximum cooling rate.

For the same temperature difference, the transfer of heat to air will probably not be as fast as the transfer of heat to water, but the temperature difference equilibrium point is going to be hard to calculate.
 
  • Like
Likes Darkmisc and russ_watters
If when you want to remove the pot it has the same temperature as the sink, (thermal balance), then leaving it inside will have a time that depends on how the water in the sink evaporates and how the sink is isolated from the environment. But if you remove it, only the water around the pot evaporates and the cooling speed of the place where you place it will depend, the lower the air temperature the faster the pot will cool. Without more data on the insulation of the sink, we will only be guessing, if it is the same environment, whose air is renewed, if the water in the sink is not renewed, then the cooling speed will depend on the surface-volume ratio for both the pot and the for the sink and the possibility of convective air currents forming around it. Everything would indicate that it would most likely cool faster out of the sink, but this depends on many experimental factors that are not established, to be able to say exactly.
 
Richard R Richard said:
the surface-volume ratio for both the pot and the for the sink
Theoretically, that is the main point.
Volume increase faster than surface area.
Within the sink the thermal mass that has to decrease in temperature is that of the pot and the water in the sink.
Out of the sink, the thermal mass is just that of the pot.
Having a greater surface area/ volume, the pot on its own should cool faster after having being cooled down from being placed with the sink.

As you say though, about experimental factors ...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top