Coordinate Charts vs Generalized Coordinates

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Messages
36,988
Reaction score
15,965
When you have a general coordinate chart on spacetime you have a lot of freedom to pick your coordinates, but you are always going to have 4 coordinates and each 4-tuple uniquely (in that chart) identifies one event in the manifold.

When you are choosing generalized coordinates for a lagrangian the generalized coordinates represent degrees of freedom of your system. So you can have an arbitrary number of coordinates and each set of coordinates identifies a state of the system.

Is there any sort of formal relationship between the two types of general coordinates?

Sorry if the question is vague, I am not sure what I am looking for, but it kind of bothers me that the manifold coordinates are somewhat "special" compared to the lagrangian coordinates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that no matter how you choose your "generalized coordinates", they are given by a coordinate chart on a manifold called the configuration space of the system. The Lagrangian is a function from the tangent bundle of that manifold into the real numbers. The action functional takes curves in the configuration space to real numbers. See "Mathematical methods of classical mechanics" by V.I. Arnold, in particular chapter 4, pages 75-83.