Copies of shredded text are needed to get 99.9% reconstruction of mutated text?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Text
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
This is a question posed by NASA astrobiologist Chris McKay (who wants to put life together back from its pieces), who really wants an answer to this question since it could lead us to reconstruct ancient genomes that are billions of years old (but mutated through years of internal radioactivity)

- A text of length N composed of an alphabet of m distinct units (eg Hamlet has 29551 words and 60 distinct units - 52 letters, space, plus 7 punctuation marks)

- Shred the text in pieces of average length X

- How many copies C of the shredded text are needed to give 99.9% reconstruction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think this is a well defined mathematical problem unless you have information about how we are can recognize that two fragments of text go next to each other. For example does "invited for a" go with "a little drink" or "a necktie party"?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top