Copyright laws that Gutenberg potentially violates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter raolduke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
AI Thread Summary
Gutenberg potentially navigates copyright laws by only providing texts whose copyrights have expired in the U.S., ensuring compliance with local laws. They utilize scanning technology to convert images into text, followed by manual error correction. Users are advised to check their local copyright regulations, as laws vary by country. The project is generally respected for its diligence in adhering to U.S. copyright standards, and the texts offered are considered credible. Overall, the site provides a valuable resource for accessing literature without cost, as long as users remain aware of their local legal context.
raolduke
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
copyright laws that Gutenberg "potentially" violates?

http://www.gutenberg.org

Could someone explain the copyright laws that Gutenberg "potentially" violates?

They use scanners that translate image into text and then go over by hand to fix errors?

Are there people on this forum that are part of Gutenberg?


Besides that this site seems awesome and a very awesome project.. Is there anyone on the board that has a problem with this site? Please elaborate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are in the U.S., none. The PG people are careful to only put up books whose copyrights have expired in the U.S. However, different countries have different copyright laws, so rather than do a country-by-country vetting of each text, they just warn that you should check your local copyright laws before downloading.

I thought that the U.S. actually had longer than usual copyrights, but I could be wrong...

Or were you concerned about the situation in a particular country?
 
I understand the copy right laws between countries i.e torrents and sweden. I thought the copy right law was a life time plus 50 years, not sure though. All of these "e-books" are credible? I did a bit of reading but I didn't understand how all of this was possible. The bit about copyrights expiring makes sense.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "credible"... they are "real" books, and I'm positive the PG folks have done their due diligence with respect to U.S. copyrights. (The U.S. is probably the most litigous society on earth... I'm certain they'd be shut down right quick otherwise! :smile:)
 
Last edited:
It's a website that operates out of the US, and they have been careful to follow US copyright laws. If you live outside the US, where the laws are different, then the free books may or may not be legal in your area.

They are just protecting themselves by saying to check your local laws before using the material they offer.
 
I know about copy right laws..
The project is respected and the texts are genuine?
Thats what I am getting from it..
Its a lot nicer to print something from that site rather then going and spending money at a book store. If they are not serving justice to the books they "digitalize" then I won't donate to their cause.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top