Graduate Correcting units from this physics paper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter halcyon_zomboid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a units discrepancy in a 1973 physics paper by Hora regarding the production of antihydrogen. The poster identifies that the left-hand side of the equation for the number of pairs produced, N_p, is dimensionless, which conflicts with the derived units. They suggest that Equation (25) is missing a factor of E_v, needing correction to include E_v^2 for proper dimensional analysis. Additionally, they note that Equation (28) yields dimensions of length^-2 instead of the expected length^2. The poster seeks assistance in resolving these unit inconsistencies.
halcyon_zomboid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I cannot make units work in this 1973 paper by Hora and need a trustworthy answer.
Hi all,

I've struggled to resolve a units issue in this 1973 paper by Hora:
https://www.academia.edu/23774741/E...tihydrogen_by_lasers_of_very_high_intensities
From the paper:

"
The number N_p of pairs produced in a plasma volume V during a time \tau and a density n_e of electrons is
N_p=\frac{e^8n_e^2}{\pi\hbar^2m_0^2c^5}V\tau\ln^3\frac{\epsilon_{kin}}{m_0c^2}.
"

However, the units do not seem to work out as the LHS is dimensionless.

For what it's worth, I found that Equation (25) is missing one factor of E_v:
\gamma=\frac{e^2\hbar}{\omega m_0^3c^3}E_v\quad(\mathrm{Incorrect})\quad\Rightarrow\quad\gamma=\frac{e^2\hbar}{\omega m_0^3c^3}E_v^2\quad(\mathrm{Correct})

However, I can't tell what factors are missing in this expression. Even in units where k=1/(4\pi\epsilon_0)=1, I end up with dimensions of \mathrm{length}^{-3} where I'm expecting dimensionless units.

FWIW, going back to Equation (28):

\sigma=\frac{e^8}{\pi\hbar^2m_0^2c^6}\ln^3\frac{\epsilon_\mathrm{kin}}{m_0c^2}

I get dimensions of \mathrm{length}^{-2}, not \mathrm{length}^2.

It looks like this is very close to working... please, can someone help me "debug" the units here?

Thanks in advance,
HZ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To fllow you what physical dimension e has in your estimation ?
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K