Correcting units from this physics paper?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter halcyon_zomboid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on resolving unit discrepancies in a 1973 physics paper by Hora regarding the production of antihydrogen. The equation for the number of pairs produced, N_p, is presented, but the left-hand side is dimensionless while the right-hand side contains dimensional factors. The user identifies a correction needed in Equation (25), where a factor of E_v is missing, leading to incorrect dimensional analysis. Additionally, the user notes that Equation (28) yields dimensions of length-2 instead of the expected length2, indicating further issues with unit consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic constants such as e, m0, and c
  • Knowledge of plasma physics and particle production mechanisms
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate equations from academic papers
NEXT STEPS
  • Review dimensional analysis techniques in classical electromagnetism
  • Study the derivation of equations related to particle production in plasma
  • Examine the role of the fine-structure constant in quantum electrodynamics
  • Investigate common errors in unit conversions in physics equations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in plasma physics, and students studying particle production mechanisms will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on dimensional analysis and unit consistency in theoretical equations.

halcyon_zomboid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I cannot make units work in this 1973 paper by Hora and need a trustworthy answer.
Hi all,

I've struggled to resolve a units issue in this 1973 paper by Hora:
https://www.academia.edu/23774741/E...tihydrogen_by_lasers_of_very_high_intensities
From the paper:

"
The number N_p of pairs produced in a plasma volume V during a time \tau and a density n_e of electrons is
N_p=\frac{e^8n_e^2}{\pi\hbar^2m_0^2c^5}V\tau\ln^3\frac{\epsilon_{kin}}{m_0c^2}.
"

However, the units do not seem to work out as the LHS is dimensionless.

For what it's worth, I found that Equation (25) is missing one factor of E_v:
\gamma=\frac{e^2\hbar}{\omega m_0^3c^3}E_v\quad(\mathrm{Incorrect})\quad\Rightarrow\quad\gamma=\frac{e^2\hbar}{\omega m_0^3c^3}E_v^2\quad(\mathrm{Correct})

However, I can't tell what factors are missing in this expression. Even in units where k=1/(4\pi\epsilon_0)=1, I end up with dimensions of \mathrm{length}^{-3} where I'm expecting dimensionless units.

FWIW, going back to Equation (28):

\sigma=\frac{e^8}{\pi\hbar^2m_0^2c^6}\ln^3\frac{\epsilon_\mathrm{kin}}{m_0c^2}

I get dimensions of \mathrm{length}^{-2}, not \mathrm{length}^2.

It looks like this is very close to working... please, can someone help me "debug" the units here?

Thanks in advance,
HZ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To fllow you what physical dimension e has in your estimation ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K