Correlation of two portfolios given price correlations of assets

  • Thread starter Thread starter grmnsplx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Correlation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the correlation between two portfolios using asset price correlations. The user proposes multiplying each portfolio vector by a correlation matrix to derive new vectors, then calculating the correlation between these vectors. Participants confirm that this approach aligns with the concept of finding the correlation coefficient between linear combinations of random variables. Suggestions include simplifying the problem with smaller matrices and using LaTex for clarity in mathematical expressions. Overall, the method appears valid for assessing portfolio correlation.
grmnsplx
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am not a stats person so I would like some help/confirmation on this one.

What I am trying to achieve (if possible) is a metric on how two portfolios (or strategies) are correlated.

Imagine there are two portfolios of assets A,B,C,D... with different weights of each asset.
eg. P1 = (5, 2, 0, -3, ...) and P2 = (0, 3, 10, -5, ...)

(Read this as Portfolio one consisting of 5 of asset A, 2 of asset B, no asset C, -3 of asset D and so on. The negative values means that the portfolio is short that asset.)

Let the correlation coefficients of each asset pair be given such that we can construct a typical correlation matrix (NxN square matrix, where ai,j is the correlation coefficient for assets i and j).

I *think* that all I need to do is:

1. Multiply each portfolio vector by the correlation matrix
Mcorrelation°P1 = X1 and Mcorrelation°P2 = X2
2. Calculate the correlation onf the two datasets (vectors) X1 and X2
Corr(X1,X2) = Corr(P1,P2)


I have done this for several portfolios and what I arrive at looks right, but I am not sure if it is right. Am I out to lunch? Thoughts?

Much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*bump*
 
grmnsplx said:
*bump*

I suspect most forum members aren't familiar with financial mathematics. (I'm not.) It sounds like you are asking a question about linear combinations of random variables. Does the definition of "correlation" between two portfolios amount to finding the correlation coefficient between two random variables, each of which is a linear combination of other random variables?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
I suspect most forum members aren't familiar with financial mathematics. (I'm not.) It sounds like you are asking a question about linear combinations of random variables. Does the definition of "correlation" between two portfolios amount to finding the correlation coefficient between two random variables, each of which is a linear combination of other random variables?

Yes, that's right.
If I am not mistaken, it looks like I am doing a Least ordinary squares.
 
I suggest you write out the case of two stocks A and B which will only involve 2x2 matrices. At least, write out what you are given and what you are asking in symbolic form. That will save people from having to guess at the meaning of things like "portfolio vector".

Look up how to use LaTex on the forum. I think your question begins as follows:

Let A,B be two independent random variables with respective means \mu_A, \mu_B and standard deviations \sigma_A,\sigma_B.

let

P_1 = \lambda_A A + \lambda_B B where \lambda_A, \lambda_B are constants.

P_2 = \alpha_A A + \alpha_B B where \alpha_A, \alpha_B are constants.

Let C _{AB} be the covariance matrix

C_{AB} = \begin{pmatrix} COV(A,A),&COV(A,B) \\ COV(B,A)&COV(B,B) \end{pmatrix}.

Now, is the "asset pair correlation matrix" supposed to be like:

R_{AB} = \begin {pmatrix} \frac{COV(A,A)}{\sigma_A^2}&\frac{COV(AB)}{\sigma_A \sigma_B} \\ \frac{COV(B,A)}{\sigma_B \sigma_A}& \frac{COV(B,B)}{\sigma_B^2} \end{pmatrix}
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top