Correspondence principle and its use

  • Thread starter Thread starter janko78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
janko78
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can you give me some examples, link of correspondence principle use in life. All I have found out are theoretical examples such as Bohr's model...

If I understand right, correspondence principle says that simple equations used for classical examples with a few data and quantum equations used for larger data, give us pretty much the same results. If we'd use simple equations instead of quantum we'd make some mistake, but not to critical.

Is my thinking correct? Can you give me an example for its use in industry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your statement of the correspondence principle in incorrect. It says that as a quantum number increases, the behavior of the quantum system resembles more and more the classically equivalent system.

One example is the harmonic oscillator. While the ground state of the quantum HO has a a maximum probability in the middle of the potential, as you go higher in energy states, the probability starts to have maxima at the classical turning points of the potential.

I don't know of any practical use of this in industry. It is mostly useful to understand the quantum to classical transition.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
The modern notion of the principle doesn't apply only to qm, but also to classical physics. The Newtonian limit of general relativity is an example, or the c --> oo limit of special relativity giving Galilean relativity.

In physics we work with effective field thories. Some theories are more complete than others, and should contain 'older' theories. E.g. General Relativity should 'contain' Newtonian gravity, special relativity and Galilean relativity. I.e. it should imply these theories in certain limits. The correspondence principle tells you how the less complete theories are obtained by limiting procedures (involving the appropriate constants like h,c or G) of the more complete theories.

For QM you can take the h --> 0 limit in the path integral and use a saddle point approximation, which leaves you only with the path implied by the action principle. As such the correspondence principle can explain the role of the action in classical mechanics and the emergence of determinism.

Hope this helps :)
 
Thanks guys.

I've been looking for some literature about cor. principle in my hometown libraries but haven't found much (I found most about Bohr's cp). The thing is I need as much literature I can get, because it's my diploma research. A few pages won't be enough. I attend mechanical engineering faculty so literature should be about cor. principle in physics. I've been looking over the internet, but haven't found enough (Wikipedia and so it's not enough).

Can you give me some internet base of that kind of literature?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top