Cosmic microwave background and a reference frame

BarbaraDav
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Dear Friends

A fleet of spaceships is given, each equipped with a differential microwave radiometer,
just like COBE was, whose detectors are antipodeanly pointing (this way one should catch
blue shifted radiation and the other one red shifted). Could their acquisitions be used to
establish a reference frame locally (!) motionless respect the cosmic microwave background ?
Supposing a such reference frame does exist, is there any reason to think it's an inertial one ?

Best wishes.

Barbara Da Vinci
Rome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BarbaraDav said:
A fleet of spaceships is given, each equipped with a differential microwave radiometer,
just like COBE was, whose detectors are antipodeanly pointing (this way one should catch
blue shifted radiation and the other one red shifted). Could their acquisitions be used to
establish a reference frame locally (!) motionless respect the cosmic microwave background ?
Yes.
BarbaraDav said:
Supposing a such reference frame does exist, is there any reason to think it's an inertial one ?
Well, in GR the idea of inertial and non-inertial reference frames doesn't really exist any more.
 
is there any reason to think it's an inertial one ?
Interesting. The nearest thing to an inertial frame in GR is a freely-falling frame. If one of your ships should adjust itself to be stationary in the CBR frame, and can maintain that without using its engines then for that ship the CBR frame may be inertial.

In other words, if the CBR frame coincides with the local FF frame, then it is inertial. Because of the irregular distribution of matter in the local universe, it's not likely to happen. Perhaps in one of the great voids where all matter is very, very far away, this coincidence would be more likely.
 
Please, what's "FF frame" ?
 
local FF = "local free falling" (i.e. a local frame centered on an inertial observer)
 
I see. Thanks !
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top